The graph below shows the precentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days.
The given bar chart illustrates the proportion of how many people went to cinemas in just one European country in three different years 2003, 2005 and 2007.
Overall, it can be seen that the number of individuals who had been to the cinemas on weekends is more than those who went during the weekdays. On Fridays, people visited the cinemas at the same rate in those three years.
Comparing the data, the number of people who went to watch a movie increased on weekends, while on weekdays, for example, on Mondays, people rarely visited the cinema. In detail, 10% of them in 2003, whereas 14% and 12% in 2005, and 2007 respectively. On Tuesdays, 2003 had the highest number of individuals at 20%, and the lowest was in 2005 at 16%. Likewise, 2003 was the most year when people had been to the cinema at 16%, but the lowest was 2007 at only %9. On Thursdays, people went increasingly to watch movies at %23 in 2003, followed by 18% in 207, and 13% in 2005. On Fridays, those people who went to cinemas were equally in all three years at 30%. Cinemas had experienced the highest demand on Saturdays at 45% in 2005, 43%, and %40 in 2003 and 2007 respectively. On Sundays, people went less to watch a movie at 30% in 2003, 34% in 2005, and 32% in 2007.
- Some people think that government is wasting money on the arts and this money culd be spent elsewhere To what extent do you agree with this view 89
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The bar graph shows the global sales in billions of dollars of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Summarise 67
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 73
- The diagram below shows how paper is made and recycled 73
- To meet the growing need for food to support an increasing population a country should make use of edible insects as a food source However some people believe that insects are not only unhealthy but harvesting them will also negatively affect nature What 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, likewise, whereas, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1024.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.4329004329 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40072076782 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493506493506 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.482926829268 1242% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.2614320388 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0909090909 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.18181818182 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145550261329 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0696520563971 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652320708305 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138056411151 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0755136624422 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 84.0 61.2550243902 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.41 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.