It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g Dinosaur dodos There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Do you agree or disagree

Many species these days are facing crucial extinction in the nearby future. Nevertheless, it is believed that this situation is indispensable for nature and human beings and preventing it from occurring is unnecessary. In my point of view, the disappearance of animal species is unpreventable, moreover, authorities and society should try their best to postpone this process.
To begin with, reincarnating circulation is a natural requirement of living species. Every appearance and disappearance are contributing to the development of the Earth. For instance, dinosaurs were first born to play a significant role in diversity then gone for others to rise. Apparently, without dinosaurs other current species such as chickens will not exist and with dinosaurs, human beings cannot live. In addition, the limited living space cannot contains every existing species. For example, if dodo birds or dinosaurs are still be witnessed these days, explicitly we will not have enough land for living, industry, or agriculture.
On the other hand, accelerating the extinction should not be encouraged. The skyrocketed proportion of declination of animals has a substantial influent on this planet’s biodiversity. For instance, the fast decrease of panda in China has put this country in alerted situation of losing the national symbol as well as an antique species. Futhermore, fauna basically is the protector of nature with their features, such as lion’s behavior in hunting preys is contributing on the food chain which has been systemically set for the good of maintaining lives.
In conclusion, animal disappearance will happen in the future, and nothing we can do but try to protect them from unexpected extinction which mainly causes by human manufacturing.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, first, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, then, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1496.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52029520295 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19457472317 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616236162362 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9878957809 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.857142857 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3571428571 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0714285714 7.06120827912 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275102940868 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807447216582 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551982059256 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164781782896 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0616686932388 0.056905535591 108% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.