The reading passage and the lecture are both discussing accurecy of Robert E. Peary expedation to North Pole. The writer claims three evidences to express that Peary did reach the North Pole. The lecturer in the other hand casts doubt on claim made in article. She mentions, there is no soild evidence that reveal arriving of Pear to Pole.
First, the writer states, Nationl Geografic Society a committee did thorough investigation, and declared arriving of Peary to Pole. This point challenged by professor. She claims, this commmitee declaring is not objective, since it was put by Peary friends, who paid money for them to do this task. Moreover, they did not realy do exame and investigation perfectly.
In addition, the author asserts, Peary' expedition which spent 37 days was not impossible, because, recently, there is another explorer named Tom made same trip in less than 37 days. The lecturer refutes this point. She states, there is a different in speedy condition and circumfrences between Peary trip and Tom's. Tom did not carry any haiey weight like commdies or food in his trip. He depend on airplane to carry food that use in his expedition.
Finally, the author points out, Peary' photos for shadow of sun is resemeble to sun pictures of Pole in these days. The professor disagrees with this statement. She illustrates to the camera that Peary used. She says, he took photograpg with camera that produce fussy and foggy pictures. This unprisice camera produce blurred and faded photos which indicat that these picyures are notv realy for North Pole.
The reading passage and the lecture are both discussing accurecy of Robert E. Peary expedation to North Pole. The writer claims three evidences to express that Peary did reach the North Pole. The lecturer in the other hand casts doubt on claim made in article. She mentions, there is no soild evidence that reveal arriving of Pear to Pole.
First, the witer states, Nationl Geografic Society a committee did thorough investigation, and declared arriving of Peary to Pole. This point challenged by professor. She claims, this commmitee declaring is not objective, since it was put by Peary friends, who paid money for them to do this task. Moreover, they did not realy do exame and investigation perfectly.
In addition, the author asserts, Peary' expedition which spent 37 days was not imposible, because, recently, there is another explorer named Tom made same trip in less than 37 days. The lecturer refutes this point. She states, there is a different in speedy condition andcircumfrence between Peary trip and Tom's. Tom did not carry any haiey weight like commdies or food in his trip. He depend on airplane to carry food that use in his expedition.
Finally, the author points out, Peary' photos for shadow of sun is resibmle to sun pictures of Pole in these days. The professor disagrees with this statement. She illustrates to the camere that Peary used. She says, he took photograpg with camera that produce fussy and foggy pictures. This unprisice camera produce blurred and faded photoswhich indicat that these picyures are notv realy for North Pole.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-15 | talelaldabous | 71 | view |
- The reaging passage and lecturer are both discussing invasion of zebra mussel to fresh water The author claims three reasons to believe that this invasion can not be stoped and cause decline in water fish population The le cturer casts doubt on claim made 60
- The friendship is the beautiful thing in our life and how to main it is the goal of every on Some believe that keeping old firends are more benefecial that new one This assay will discuse why the old friends are more effective on our life than the new one 70
- The passage and lecture about agnostids which were a group of marines animals which became extinct many years ago The writer claim that there are three theories about how agnostids ate and how they may lived The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in artic 60
- The passage and lecture both talk about truth of reaching North pole by Robert E Peary The author claims several arguments support for the truth of Peary s claim The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article She mentions there are no solid evevts that 65
- The readind and lecturer about Torreya trees inFlorida and how to save these trees from decline The author claims three way to save the tree The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in lecture She said these ways infortunatly incorrect First the author ment 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading passage and the lecture are ...
^^
Line 1, column 195, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ss that Peary did reach the North Pole. The lecturer in the other hand casts doubt ...
^^^
Line 1, column 328, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o soild evidence that reveal arriving of Pear to Pole. First, the witer states...
^^
Line 3, column 386, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'depends'.
Suggestion: depends
...t like commdies or food in his trip. He depend on airplane to carry food that use in h...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, moreover, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1303.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 259.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03088803089 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57248925913 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6138996139 0.540411800872 114% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 3.25607064018 338% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.2161080453 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 68.5789473684 110.228320801 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.6315789474 21.698381199 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.36842105263 7.06452816374 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.27373068433 257% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.411631891496 0.272083759551 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132824981935 0.0996497079465 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.169298317303 0.0662205650399 256% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.277020326852 0.162205337803 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.316432621806 0.0443174109184 714% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.3589403974 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 53.8541721854 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.3 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.