Modern technology helps shoppers much while others do not think so
Discuss both view and give your opinio
It is said that technological gadgets make a considerable contribution to people to go shopping recently. Otherwise, there are plenty of people finding it not as useful as they expect. This writing will discuss both views of this trend and demonstrate the writer's point of view.
On the one hand, it is modern technology that supports people to buy products in plenty of ways. To begin with, people tend to spend much of time and fee on transportation in order to buy their basic needs such as food, clothes, so on. Customers nowadays could erase these inconveniences thanks to smart devices which provide people with extensive online stores just in one click. In addition, people could decrease the chance of having difficulties in searching for what they desire. There is a diversity of new daily products waiting for customers and clients to pick up on the Internet and this is all thanks to the development of technology.
On the other hand, there is plenty of drawbacks technology embraces that could not be denied. First of all,
Products that are not qualified play an essential role in this trend. The customer often catches plenty of advertisements on social websites taking exaggeration about the items, while the quality is truly opposite what producers say. Secondly, the advance of online shopping increases the risk for a number of people to lose their careers. For instance, almost Vietnamese people have a tendency to run an online business and so do large companies, this doing could close the door of career prospects of the working-class employees.
From the writer's point of view, I am prone to the priority that technological advance assists customers in several ways of shopping. Nowadays, people could access and buy authentic international products more easily comparing to the past considerably thanks to the Internet.
In conclusion, the development of smart equipment is believed to boost people's conveniences in buying products. Moreover, there is still the opinion that technological gadgets do not contribute as much as desired.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-24 | phamquoctrung2007 | 84 | view |
| 2023-09-24 | phamquoctrung2007 | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-24 | phamquoctrung2007 | 92 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | luu_nhu@193 | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-27 | tungta | 84 | view |
- Many people today are choosing to travel abroad to other country Why is this happening Is this positive or negative 67
- Modern technology helps shoppers much while others do not think so Discuss both view and give your opinio 78
- Many people say that modern technology has made shopping more easier while others believe it does not help shopper much Discuss both view and give your opinion 78
- Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible Do you think this is a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and includ 73
- The government should make laws people s nutrition and food choice Others argue that it would be their choice Discuss both view and give your opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 108, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... that could not be denied. First of all, Products that are not qualified play an ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, then, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, first of all, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1739.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19104477612 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9209592043 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564179104478 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.8496745873 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.294117647 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7058823529 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.70588235294 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13933046641 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0445575955819 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503660748635 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0772791193702 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0250418359138 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.