environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians, not individuals as individuals can do too little. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that politicians are responsible for environmental conservation. Personally, I agree with this view, however, I also think that as individuals, we can do so much to safeguard the environment.
There are two main reasons why citizens have an important role in the work of protecting the living environment on this earth. One reason is that most of the world's population are employees working in companies, and they have to travel to work by their vehicles every day. As a result, it releases carbon dioxide emissions into the atmosphere, which later leads to air pollution and global warming. Nevertheless, it can be solved by the increasing amount of workers who replace diesel- and gas-powered cars and trucks with electric ones or use public transport. Moreover, teenagers nowadays tend to buy second-hand clothing which is not only suitable for a student's pocket but also improves their creativity, confidence to cut, sew or do anything they like to the items since it is easy to see videos about DIY thrift clothes ideas on Youtube.
Apart from the practical benefits expressed above, I believe that environmental protection is still the responsibility of politicians as people need laws and rules so that they base on those things to stop what they are doing wrong. Firstly, in order to promote the use of electric cars, the government should provide car buyers with financial rebates upfront and expanding tax credits so buying vehicles is not as financially burdensome along with the construction of more charging stations around the whole country. They also need to refurbish and improve public transport so commuters will feel comfortable and convenient while using them, according to President Joe Biden's goal for electric vehicles. Secondly, companies that discharge chemical waste from their factories into the sea or rivers must be held accountable for their actions and be fined heavily.
In conclusion, for the reason I have mentioned above, I strongly believe that politicians are mainly in charge of environmental protection whereas individuals can also contribute a great amount of effort to this work.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-22 | ryannguyen0303 | 85 | view |
- Many people are working longer hours Why is this happening What problems can this cause to people 89
- Some people believe that reading stories from a book is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Online shopping is increasing dramatically How could this trend affect our environment and the kinks of jobs required 84
- The world of work is rapidly changing and employees cannot depend on having the same work or the same work conditions for life Discuss the possible causes and suggest ways to prepare for people to work in the future 84
- The graph shows the percentages of people going to cinemas in a European country on different days 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 158, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...s earth. One reason is that most of the worlds population are employees working in com...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, whereas, while, apart from, in conclusion, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1792.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22448979592 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94769921 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632653061224 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.5079439396 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.333333333 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5833333333 20.7667163134 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.25 7.06120827912 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17201096809 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0645060571471 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0755981167188 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130797153838 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.073660958378 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.59 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.