Nowadays young people are leaving their homes from rural areas to study or work in the cities. What are the reasons? Do advantages of this development outweigh its disadvantages?
There is a controversial idea heating a debate over the fact that a growing number of young migrants from the countryside to cities for education and work. Obviously, this phenomenon has both pros and cons yet the disadvantages still outweighs its counterpart.
In terms of the underlying reasons, resulting from imbalanced social development in multiple aspects, the geographical differences in life quality are the major triggers. Due to the less likely to be a regional economic or political centre to attract large company investment, most rural and remote areas may not be able to show their competitive advantages in providing sufficient job opportunities. As a result, despite the keen competition in many metropolises, thanks to its prosperity, urban areas are extremely attractive to fresh graduates since they offer higher incomes and more promising career paths with substantial work experience accumulated from famous companies.
Conversely, the side-effects of this phenomenon to both rural and urban areas, however, might be more worrying than what a society can benefit from. It is obvious that they are likely to encounter a frenzy of life pressure from either work or study due to the fierce competition in urban areas. Moreover, although the entire human resource of a country can be better utilised, the large city is likely to be the only that will tremendously benefit. Losing a young and competent labour force is having an adverse bearing on the farming industry. Consequently, the local economic progress will be gradually declined, which leads to the gap between these two locations being further widened. Besides, the uneven population distributions may lead to other resource-related social problems such as the higher demand for accommodations compared to the limited urban space.
In conclusion, the occurrence of this trend mainly attributed to the greater chances that the metropolises offer to inhabitants. However, this case may act as a disturbance in both rural and urban areas.
- Many countries import a large amount of food from other parts of the world Is this a positive or negative development 89
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language Do you think this is a positive or negative social development 89
- The diagrams below give information about the manufacture of frozen fish pies Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparions where relevant 11
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why is it the case What can be done to attract more local people to visit these places 84
- Nowadays young people are leaving their homes from rural areas to study or work in the cities What are the reasons Do advantages of this development outweigh its disadvantages 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 868, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ns compared to the limited urban space. In conclusion, the occurrence of this tr...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, conversely, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1710.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42857142857 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10274872245 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628571428571 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7648300793 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.538461538 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2307692308 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.76923076923 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21457894368 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0670992239261 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444659255724 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126330879296 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.048135461321 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.29 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.