Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language. Do you think this is a positive or negative social development?
There is a controversial idea heating a debate over whether scientifically claimed future human beings are likely to use the same language in any region of the world for their daily communication. Obviously, this phenomenon has both pros and cons, however, the disadvantages still outweighs its counterpart.
Apparently, if global citizens adopted an international language, this over time would put many natural cultural identities and some minority cultures on the verge of extinction, when those ethenic groups gradually adopt a shared culture. As a result, the effect of declining cultural diversity is destructive, causing people to live in a simple world and think and act in a similar way since everyone is monolingual. Moreover, due to the fact that individual discrepancies in habitat, preferences or even biological structure, some syllables of that international language can be pronounced with a different pitch or using other words to communicate the same idea. Such differences in use of words will potentially be a hindrance to communication rather than supporting humanality with ease and convenience.
While the aforementioned disadvantages are widely acknowledged, it is unfair if those benefits are ignored. In different areas of global communication, such as science and new, having a common language will evidently removeds communication barriers and accelerate the convenience. For instance, English as a mostly existing dominant language currently boosts efficiency and prevents misunderstanding on many formal occasions. Likewise, a wealth of introductions or know-how will be used much more effortlessly. There would be little effort for manuals written in different languages to guide users a certain procedure in the use of a piece of equipment. This may mean that every citizen can enjoy the usefulness of technology and its ensuing higher standard of living.
In conclusion, as the predictions of the faraway future that humans will use the same language for communication can pose more dangers for culture rather than offer benefits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-26 | Yamin_j | 61 | view |
| 2021-11-20 | hieutrungpham7201 | 89 | view |
| 2021-11-12 | gianggiangvn | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-12 | quynhhuong656 | 89 | view |
| 2021-09-05 | miminguyen | 73 | view |
- The pie chart below shows information about world water resources and the bar chart shows the utilization of water in Egypt Saudi Arabia and Canada 92
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why is it the case What can be done to attract more local people to visit these places 84
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language Do you think this is a positive or negative social development 89
- Some education systems make students focus on certain subjects at the age of 15 while others require students to study a wide range of subjects until they leave school What are the benefits of each system Which is better 89
- Many countries import a large amount of food from other parts of the world Is this a positive or negative development 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 371, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a similar way" with adverb for "similar"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ive in a simple world and think and act in a similar way since everyone is monolingual. Moreover...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 731, Rule ID: IT_IS[7]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
... enjoy the usefulness of technology and its ensuing higher standard of living. ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, however, if, likewise, may, moreover, so, still, then, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1761.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60828025478 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33540461294 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62101910828 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7487259349 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.461538462 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1538461538 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46153846154 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15482629102 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0530702674407 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0396942871543 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109087846864 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299710171169 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.