It is clear that the recent debate on the co-existence between the international development and traditional cultures does not seem to come an end anytime soon. Although the increasing business and cultural relationships among different nations have certain implications on the status quo as well as current lifestyles, I personally believe the impact on national identities appears insignificant compared to the greater benefits this trend can bring.
To begin with, there are a host of reasons why national cultures are considered to be lost because of the cooperation among multinational organizations. This is predicated on the consumption that this development could pose a serious threat to cultural and traditional value. Take, for example, the acceptance of same sex marriages and premarital cohabitation, which used to be strongly opposed in the past. Similarly, the appearance of a myriad of fast food chains, KFC, say, coupled with the hustles and bustles from daily life, directly changes people’s eating habit. This provides an alternative option as opposed to cooking on their own, negatively underestimating the importance of family meals was the way their older generations did.
However, I would argue this tendency is far more advantageous. Firstly, since international companies are increasingly expanding their businesses, there is greater need for the labor workforce. This contributes to job opportunities for local people, helping residents to earn money and improve the standard of living. Furthermore, in order to compete with enterprises from oversea, local firms need to be more creative and innovative, which not only helps such domestic companies develop more sustainably, but also positively impact on the local economy. Finally, increasing cultural contacts between countries leads individuals to have a deep understanding of other cultures, avoiding culture shocks or unwanted intense conflicts. In fact, an Italian person fought with a local one on Bui Vien street due to the misunderstanding of non-verbal language.
In conclusion, while it is true that the interference between businesses and cultures worldwide can cause disappearance of some traditional cultures, I believe it much more beneficial.
- The charts below show the proportion of people s total spending in a particular European country was spent on different commodities and services in 1958 and in 2008 89
- Advertisements are becoming more and more common in everyday life Is it a positive or negative development 11
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online Is this a positive or negative development 84
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online Is this a positive or negative development 61
- The maps below show changes that took place in Youngsville in New Zealand overa 25 year period from 1980 to 2005 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 28, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
...an bring. To begin with, there are a host of reasons why national cultures are co...
^^^^
Line 5, column 855, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...isunderstanding of non-verbal language. In conclusion, while it is true that the...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, similarly, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, as well as, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1913.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69345238095 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25971940828 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639880952381 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 604.8 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0102512227 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.642857143 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7142857143 7.06120827912 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159317685123 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0481231867211 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044496219313 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0966832915101 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0179081067583 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.02 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.