The table compare the energy production by different source in UK.
The given table chart depicts, the information about the comparison of energy production by natural gas, oil, coal, nuclear power and hydropower during time period in 1919,1996 and 2000 in UK.
In 1990, energy production by natural gas was 76 million ton.the energy production by natural gas rose significantly to 79 million turn in 2078 million tonnes in 1996. 77 million tonne energy produced by oil in 1990. Then it was 78 and 79 million turn in 1996 and 2000 respectively.
The power generated by coal 35 million tonne in 1990. After that, it rose to 15 million tonnes in 1996, but in 2000 declined by 34 million ton. 20 million tonne energy generated by a nuclear power it increased 30 million turn in 1996. After increasing it dropout 25 million tonne in 2000. The energy produced by hydropower 0.3 million tonne in 1990. After, it rose 0.4 and 0.6 million turn in 1996 and 2000 respectively.
Overall, the energy generated by natural gas oil and hydropower continuous increased in given time period. And nuclear power and coal decline in the end of time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-26 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-26 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-10-25 | hien3112 | 67 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- Having more money and less free is better than earning less money and having more free time 73
- The charts below show the percentage of five kind of books sold by a bookseller between 1972 and 2012 67
- The table chart shows the information about the expenses person of retired single person and couple person in Australia for their comfortable of their lifestyle more and more people are using technological gadget so they believe that there is no need to p 56
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a large fish called the Salman 90
- More and more children in developed countries is becoming overweight discuss the causes and solution 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 236, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...r it increased 30 million turn in 1996. After increasing it dropout 25 million tonne ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 881.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78804347826 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60642450955 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.434782608696 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.9279515818 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.4166666667 112.824112599 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3333333333 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.41666666667 5.23603664747 27% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118008828323 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0512968183161 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628618314509 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0978961464545 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0659839890063 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.91 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.44 8.06136585366 80% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.