Many students find it difficult to focus or pay attention at school nowadays. What are the reasons for this? What can be done to solve this problem?
Regarding the issue of education, there has been an alarming concern that many learners are distracted from lessons. There are several justifications leading to the tendency, and I believe that the educational authorities can take viable approaches to the problem.
It is undeniable that the implementation of technological handheld devices and the quality of classes are the underlying reasons for students’ distraction. Albeit the technological application, namely tablets and laptops, makes lessons far more intriguing compared to orthodox teaching methods, some students often divert their attention to networking sites and games due to the irresistible appealing. Furthermore, the monotony of the lessons can also lead to lack of concentration in classes. Evidently, the teacher-centered approach in education that focuses merely on the lectures and theoretical assignments may fail to catch the students’ attention. That is to say, in the modern era, while children can get access to various sources of information to expand their knowledge from more interactive ways on the Internet, the lessons at schools can be tedious and lack relevance to reality; thus, learners tend to ignore their lessons.
There are numerous pragmatic measures that can be taken to address the predicament. It is beyond doubt that by implementing more effective teaching methods, students will no longer find it struggling to focus on the lessons. To be more specific, the promotion of more interactive classes can block the stream of potential distractions from online networking platforms. Should they have to prepare their lessons in advance such as presentations or making speeches instead of listening, they will not have spare time for other tasks but focus on their learning. Moreover, only by training teachers professionally can they design the teaching contents more practical. For instance, teachers can create projects including teamwork, discussion or even making models to ensure interaction and attention among students.
In conclusion, students nowadays struggle to concentrate in classes due to various causes namely technological gadgets and tedious lessons; however, several feasible measures can be adopted to resolve the problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-20 | Zeroplague0407 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | Vivi_peach | 89 | view |
| 2023-06-27 | Jaden_ | 72 | view |
| 2023-02-11 | minh phương phạm hồng | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-02 | levanhoan123 | 89 | view |
- Some believe children should be taught to give speeches and presentations in school Why is this Should this be taught in schools 78
- Large companies use sports events to promote their products Some people think this has a negative impact on sports To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Many students find it difficult to focus or pay attention at school nowadays What are the reasons for this What can be done to solve this problem 78
- students giving good ratings 78
- Many students find it difficult to focus or pay attention at school nowadays What are the reasons for this What can be done to solve this problem 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1909.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71556886228 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1410153813 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583832335329 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2689620245 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.357142857 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190368400495 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634627259834 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0268581175976 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111302806325 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0269129815624 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.45 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1909.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71556886228 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1410153813 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583832335329 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2689620245 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.357142857 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190368400495 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634627259834 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0268581175976 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111302806325 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0269129815624 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.45 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.