Some people think the newly built houses should be the same as the old houses in local areas. Others argue that local authorities should allow people to build houses in their own styles. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Improvement in facilities and infrastructure in recent years have become more popular among cultures. Consequently, this raises the question for local neighbors whether currently constructed accommodations should be similar to the old ones or be allowed to come up with their owners' expectations. Although both views are valid, I wholeheartedly believe that recent housing should be constructed the same as the traditional styles.
There are many reasons why people support the latter statement. There is a common belief which regards old buildings as out of date and posting potential threats to inhabitants. Since traditional houses are constructed by using unsustainable materials such as wood and stones, they are likely to be knocked down by severe disastrous events, for instance, earthquake and hurricane. Moreover, modern housings provide their owners with further comfortability as they are erected to adapt immediately with current technology. The example can be seen easily in the case of hygiene and health insurance due to the installation of air conditioners and heaters.
In contrast, I believe that modern accommodations should be built to be the same as the out-dated ones. To begin, I would argue that this maintenance helps the local traditions and cultures survive in this globalisation time. The reason for this discussion is when children are brought up in such uniquely cultural conditions, they have an opportunity to explore and understand the traditional value of their local areas which means that traditions and costume are likely to be passed down through generations. In addition, constructing old-fashioned houses are associated with numerous benefits to local finance. The cases to be discussed are areas with historical values. By measuring this action, these neighbors attract more tourists and investment from local officials to stabilize their one-of-a-kind beauty.
In conclusion, while many people support the idea that local officials should make rooms for the constructions reflecting their owners identical styles, t suggest that accommodations should be kept in old fashion because of their benefits. From my perspective, both local authorities and individuals should consider wisely not to underestimate historical value as well as polarising technological convenience.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-20 | trinhthanh1 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | trinhthanh1 | 56 | view |
| 2021-10-24 | nganphuong05 | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-25 | datnguyentienhnvn@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-26 | paenziii | 67 | view |
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is best to try and improve such situation Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
- The pictures below show the process of making clothes from recycled plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The bar chart below shows the proportions of English men and women of different ages who were living alone in 2011 The pie chart compares the numbers of bedrooms in these one person households 78
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 78
- Some people believe that one world government would be better than a national government Do you think the benefits of this system outweigh the disadvantages 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 410, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s polarising technological convenience.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, moreover, so, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1986.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73988439306 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22191989614 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578034682081 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 613.8 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.1606657755 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.125 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1875 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333338615819 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10147559284 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062926796279 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204637519568 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0426855335962 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.11 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.