The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and
2040 in three different countries.
The line graph illustrates a comparison of the percentage of people aged 65 and more from 1940 to 2040 in three nations namely Japan, Sweden and the USA.
Overall, it is apparent that the proportion of the elderly in three countries shows an upward trend over the period. Especially, the Japan figure is expected to experience the most dramatic increase among the three nations.
In 1940, the number of elderly people in the USA contained nearly 10% of its population, which was the highest in comparison to about 7% and only 5% in Sweden and Japan, respectively. In the next 80-year period, the percentage of Americans and Swedish aged 65 and over rose gradually to under 20%. Whereas the figure for Japan dropped to under 5% before slightly increased to approximately 7% in the 2020s.
In the next 20 years, a considerable growth is predicted in the percentage of old citizens in Japan, with over 25% of its population in 2040. Similarly, the Sweden figure is also expected to see the same trend, with precisely 25% compares to about 23% in America, which is the lowest figure of the three countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-17 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | Phuong1810 | 84 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | Phuong1810 | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | Phuong1810 | 67 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | nguyenhnil | 67 | view |
- the diagram below shows how the Australian Bureau of Meteorology collects up information on the weather in order to produce reliable forecasts 73
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 84
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The chart shows the percentage of women and men in one Asian country who passed when they took their driving test between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should s
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 408, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eased to approximately 7% in the 2020s. In the next 20 years, a considerable gro...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, similarly, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 917.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80104712042 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71019161044 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539267015707 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.3504850047 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.625 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244402802594 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101925747691 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.087958968066 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152277359507 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0647546200675 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 408, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eased to approximately 7% in the 2020s. In the next 20 years, a considerable gro...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, similarly, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 917.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80104712042 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71019161044 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539267015707 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.3504850047 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.625 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244402802594 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101925747691 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.087958968066 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152277359507 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0647546200675 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.