Topic: Online communication is becoming more popular than face-to-face communication.
Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Recent decades have witnessed tremendous achievements in many sectors of information technology, especially the proliferation of online communication programs. While this trend may possess certain drawbacks in respect of cyber attack; nevertheless, I believe that Internet-based communication may provide more strengths than weaknesses.
On the one hand, an upsurge in the use of online applications for communication purposes could make enterprises vulnerable to cyber crime. The number of hackers using Trojans and involving in identity thefts have recently become more skilled and difficult to detect, even towards specialized software and experts. Confidential information of companies and the public is usually the favorite target of such criminals. Amid the outbreak of Covid-19 pandemic, for example, employees of most companies work from home, and consequently, they tend to receive spam emails or be stolen personal data from online accounts if they are unaware and careless.
On the other hand, I opine that online communication brings certain benefits to users. To begin with, operational expenses can be dramatically reduced in many activities within corporations. For instance, it is unnecessary for leaders to send subordinates to attend overseas conferences where incurring per diem might be exorbitant. Thanks to virtual meeting services such as Skype and Google Meet, the money for collective tasks can be diminished to a great extent, which helps preserve funds for other projects. Moreover, employees can enjoy distance working without the need of actually going to the workplace. Not only can this practice be time-saving, it also improves work productivity. Usually on normal days, it takes a certain amount of time for them to travel to work; but now, they are no longer worried about transportation and have more ample time for either concentrating on their own assignments or completing daily schedule activities before the working time starts. Work efficiency, as a result, could be enhanced by both employees’ feelings of comfort and their generous time budget.
In conclusion, online communication has become an inevitable phenomenon in the corporate world. Though it may increase the risks of online criminal acts, I believe that its advent will benefit modern people in the long run in terms of cost alleviation and work effectiveness.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-19 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 67 | view |
| 2021-09-06 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-28 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 89 | view |
- The graph gives information about the number of people in Australia who used Chinese Arabic Italian or Greek as their first mother tongue Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The two tables below show the number of international students from different resource countries in Canada and the USA in two school years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Many people are working longer and longer hours What are the reasons and effects KHANH HOMEWORK MAY 29 56
- Topic Some people believe that sport has an important role in society Others however feel that it is nothing more than a leisure activity for some people Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
- Topic To succeed in a business one needs to know math To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2012.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58888888889 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13776282653 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641666666667 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 635.4 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.3460703212 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.75 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.125 7.06120827912 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130053805419 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0478299466527 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592629776484 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0990770697637 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445027889638 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.17 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2012.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58888888889 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13776282653 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641666666667 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 635.4 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.3460703212 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.75 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.125 7.06120827912 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130053805419 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0478299466527 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592629776484 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0990770697637 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445027889638 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.17 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.