Some people think that getting old is a negative thing, whereas others think it is much easier for people to live in modern society. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Aging with time is a natural process of humanity. As people get older, the advancements and developments of society become more explicit, forcing these individuals to keep pace with the modernization of the world. As a result, stances are indicating that getting old offers little benefits, whereas others believe this can be advantageous for the elderly living in this digitally integrated society. In this essay, both facets of the situation will be elucidated before drawing any further conclusion.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that elderly people may receive more care and support when going out in the public. To cite an example, in many urban areas nowadays, specifically during peak hours when there are high possibilities of congestion, people of old age might receive assistance in crossing the street more than younger ones. Another prominent example is that when commuting on public transports like buses, the elder commuters will have the privilege of being offered a seat, which may do wonders for their general well-being. By shedding light on these examples, it is crystal clear that people can have more advantages when utilizing public transport and accommodation on the account of being old.
On the other hand, aging is also synonymous with being more prone to illnesses and diseases. To specify, the closer people reach older adulthood, the worse their immune system becomes. Courtesy of these drastic changes within their body, combining with stratospherically high levels of pollution in public places, the seniors of society may have to run up against a host of health problems like cancer or bones fragility, which could lead to fatality if there is no provision of healthcare and special treatment. Furthermore, living in this digitalized world can be difficult for old people by virtue of staying up-to-date with technological advancements. This is not an easy task for the elderly, especially those who used to live in the era of poverty and impoverishment when prevalent recreational activities were reading books and playing chess rather than interacting with others through add-ons and applications.
In conclusion, notwithstanding the privilege the elderly may have when commuting on buses, from a broader viewpoint, these persons indeed have to face up with a wider range of health problems and inabilities of adapting to modern life than adults and youngsters. Therefore, I believe that negative facets of this have eclipsed the benefits it brings. All things considered, it is believed that more healthcare and insurance should be given to these people to help them to live a better life in the modern era.
- The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 85
- The chart below shows the process of waste paper recycling 81
- The chart below shows the places visited by different people living in Canada Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The pictures show how tea is produced They also illustrate the process of making a cup of tea 87
- The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, may, so, therefore, well, whereas, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 41.998997996 162% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2234.0 1615.20841683 138% => OK
No of words: 424.0 315.596192385 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26886792453 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91968558269 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 176.041082164 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577830188679 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 703.8 506.74238477 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.7567793494 49.4020404114 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.625 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4375 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169961737099 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0597203918402 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440621186383 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110791039433 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325284419663 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 78.4519038076 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.