Children should do organized activities in their free time while others believe children should be free to do what they want. Discuss both views and give your opinion?
In this day and age, there has been debatable in terms of children’s activities in their spare time. Whilst some people think that it would be better for children to take part in organized activities, others think that people should let children roam free to select what they desire. From my point of view, I firmly believe that joining in grouped activities will do wonders more for children.
On the one hand, it offers certain plausible reasons when allowing children to opt for what they want. First of all, children possibly discover new things around them which they have never known before. This might help children to develop their innate talents and create a desirable life for themselves. Secondly, when children are made free to follow their interests, they are able to enhance many soft skills to facilitate a safe and convenient career path. In fact, they have many hands-on experiences when exploring those things. For instance, one of my best friends, his parents permitted him to intrinsically do anything he went for in his childhood. Thanks to this, he succeeded in investing in business due to his practical knowledge which he had drawn before.
On the other hand, there is a wide range of compelling reasons to explain why people think that children should participate in organized activities. One evident strength is that when attending these kinds of activities, children will have their own leaders to guide and teach them. They usually mix both educational knowledge and useful activities for children to play. Children can not only have a sense of relaxation but also broaden their horizons. Besides, by participating in arranged activities, children will be likely to steer clear of useless games which take a toll on people’s health physically and mentally. Another noting reason is that children have lots of golden opportunities to open their networking sites with other friends when attending those leisure pursuits.
In conclusion, it seems to me that although there is a host of feasible benefits to allow people to choose what they desire, I firmly believe that children should do arranged activities in their free time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-13 | dann061006 | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-10 | dann061006 | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-10 | dann061006 | 67 | view |
| 2022-03-18 | Trần Ánh Vy | 56 | view |
| 2022-03-17 | Trần Ánh Vy | 56 | view |
- More children in developed countries are becoming overweight This is a serious problem for wealthy countries Discuss some causes and effects of this problem 73
- People say that a country will benefit greatly if its students study abroad To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some think that all entertainment TV programmes should educate people about the importance of social issues To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Many people believe that it is easier to have a healthy lifestyle in the countryside Other believe that there are health benefits of living in cities Discuss both views and give your opinions 56
- Some countries allow old people to work to any age that they want Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 46.0 24.0651302605 191% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1811.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11581920904 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65336653803 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576271186441 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9841451114 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.529411765 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8235294118 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.17647058824 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.388828165263 0.244688304435 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122425028408 0.084324248473 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0858802984068 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.277441088286 0.151304729494 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0916510522048 0.056905535591 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.