Giving lectures in auditoriums to large numbers of students is an old way of teaching With the technology available today there is no justification for it and everything should be done online To what extend do you agree or disagree Give your opinion

Obtaining education, either from lecture or online study have their own intrinsic as well as indispensible values. Even though in ancient time, people used to go to whether schools or colleges in terms of getting study. However, now this trend also available but with the help of online education is proved as a boon for students. In this essay, I give my behalf to technical education.

Commencing with the most salient reason of online education is that wide range of intraction. In other words, despite living in any nook and corner of the world, learners not only obtain top-level education, but also they have a chance to communicate with new students through of technological study. Due to this, pupils can occupy great education along with cultivating their communication skill.
In addition to this, it has proved as a boon for those who are settled in countryside areas, as they do not need to commute one place to another place in order to receive superior education.
However, without having doubt, vast majority of students still believe in face to face lectures. This might be because learners can clear their doubt in class room with face to face interaction. To explain it, it is well known fact that in class students always keep an eye on their study and do not face any disturbance, even they can easily clear their study doubt. Most interesting thing is that, class lectures build a bride between the relationship of educator and student
In conclusion, although online education is easiest way to get education with multifarious options, classroom education cannot overlooked because it gives a great chance to deeply concentrate on study.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 42, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the easiest'.
Suggestion: is the easiest
...n conclusion, although online education is easiest way to get education with multifarious ...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, so, still, well, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1390.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03623188406 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72002770659 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.597826086957 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.9392600457 49.4020404114 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.833333333 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.41666666667 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142959722604 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052087086258 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0290423783252 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0766449921496 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0234630070438 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.