Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobby, and interest , and whether they are married or single.
Some people say that this information maybe relevant or useful. Other disagree.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
Job seekers are sometimes required to provide private information in their job interviews. Some people argue that this requirement is not necessary, but in my view, I believe that collecting candidates' personal information is essential and relevant to the work.
On the one hand, some people do not agree with this practice as they think such information is irrelevant and susceptible to change. Firstly, candidates feel that their hobbies, interests, and marital status are private information, which is not related to the job they are applying for. Thus, asking these questions is redundant and might make people, especially introverts, uncomfortable. Secondly, hobbies and interests are not fixed. They can change over time and, therefore, are not significant for the context of the employer and the job. Additionally, some candidates shy from sharing personal information for fear of future trouble.
On the other hand, I personally believe that, besides asking about professional abilities, the interviewer should ask candidates about hobbies, interests, and even marital status because this increases the company's chance of choosing the right person for the vacancy. Although hobbies and interests are personal, the interviewer can base them on them to determine their suitability for the job requirements. For example, many jobs have special features, such as shifts or business travels. Moreover, employees need to have ways to relieve stress for some jobs like playing sports or doing exercise. Hence, employers sometimes assess candidates' ability to cope with stress by asking about their hobbies and interests.
In conclusion, although some people do not agree with being asked about their personal information during interviews, I think it is vital to request further insight into a candidate's life to enhance the effectiveness of the recruitment.
- Your are working for a international company You have seen a advertisement for a training course which is useful for your job Write a letter to your manager In your letter Describe training course you want to do Explain what the company could do to help y 87
- Your local council is considering closing a sports and leisure centre that it runs in order to save money Write a letter to the local council In your letter Give details of how you and your friends and family use the centre Explain why the sports and leis 81
- You recently attended a meeting at a hotel When you returned home you found you had left some important papers at the hotel Write a letter to the manage of the hotel In your letter Say where you think you left the papers Explain why they are so important 87
- Some people say that in all level of education from primary schools to universities too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills Do you argree or disagree 86
- News stories on TV and in the newspapers are often accompanied by pictures Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words What is your opinion about this 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 173, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'candidates'' or 'candidate's'?
Suggestion: candidates'; candidate's
...vital to request further insight into a candidates life to enhance the effectiveness of th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1581.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56690140845 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94824723751 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573943661972 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.6462204719 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.928571429 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7857142857 7.06120827912 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.414193855226 0.244688304435 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136329160741 0.084324248473 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427972833168 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249818338518 0.151304729494 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.069523796056 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.