Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socializing online to meeting one another in person. Why do you think this is the case? What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
In this day and age, an increasing number of people arre concerned about the fact that teenagers tend to communicate through the Internet rather than facing one to one. There are some factors to justify this issue and a number of measures which should be taken into account.
One primary motive for online meeting is the development of technology. In other words, it is the enhancement of electronic gadgets that children can use their own phones for video calls, text messages and other modern activities. As a consequence, they cannot start a conversation with anybody naturally as well as they can become tacit in real life. Take young people in some coffee shops thesedays as a prime example, while they are staying there, they often spend those time suffering on the Internet instead of sharing their stories with each other. Another fundamental explanation is that there are myriad gaming options available, where juveniles can play and connect with others at the same time; therefore, they prefer playing games with their friends to meeting them physically.
There are some effective resolutions to the problems of the virtual world. One possible way to deal with this issue is cutting down on hours spent chatting online and substitute it by sparing quality moments with family and friends. Another feasible action would be for adolescents to be tutored to fully realize the core values of life, which lies in having a whale of a time with beloveds in reality. Teenagers, for instance, should turn of inessential notifications on social media during the conversation with others, attempt to chat face-to-face instead of texting, or they could try to partake in volunteer work or social clubs to make more friends.
In conclusion, reducing the time for scrolling through the Internet, spending more time with family and friends and realizing the core values of life are effective for youngsters in dealing with the issue. If individuals implemented these remedies, the excessive use of social networking sites would soon decline. Also, society must ensure steps are taken to prevent this problem from deteriorating further. Only by doing so, can the society maintain dynamic and sustainable development.
- The flow chart below shows the procedures to get a driving license in US 72
- The bar chart shows the average size class in primary schools and lower secondary schools in 6 countries compared to the world average in 2006 67
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 84
- Should arts related entertainment venues such as museums and art galleries be free of charge for the general public or should a charge apply for admittance Discuss this issue and give your opinion 78
- The chart below shows information about fuel used in the transport sector in different countries in Europe compared to the EU average in 2009 and 2010 59
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In this day and age, an increasing numbe...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es which should be taken into account. One primary motive for online meeting is...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ir friends to meeting them physically. There are some effective resolutions to ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... or social clubs to make more friends. In conclusion, reducing the time for scr...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1856.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 358.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1843575419 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68554174288 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608938547486 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.970401672 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.733333333 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8666666667 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187990763047 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0596227506569 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462514164503 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114600658061 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324846456008 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.