The chart below gives information about car ownership in the UK from 1975 to 2005.
The line chart provided depicts the proportion of car ownership in the UK over a period of 30 years from 1975 to 2005.
Overall, it is evident that the portion of no car in the UK from 1975 to 2005 witnessed a plummet whereas the opposite was true of the remaining figures, and the percentage of 1 car always ranked in the first in 30 years.
As can be seen from the line chart given, there was a slight decrease of the proportion of 1 car in the UK between 1975 and 1985 to about 38%, while that of no car crashed to almost 25% in 1985. There was a negative correlation between the figure for 1 car and that of no car from 1985 to 2005, in which the former minimally rose to merely 45% and the latter gradually slipped to approximately 23% in 2005.
As far as the line chart is concerned, the portion of 2 cars in the UK always stood at the third position between 1975 and 2005, which was higher compared to that of 3 cars. The figure for 2 cars and 3 cars witnessed a gradual increase in 30 years and reached a peak of about 18% and 10% in 2005, respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-28 | chau hoang | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-23 | Raspreet | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-08 | Wulan | 61 | view |
| 2022-11-03 | Manjinder_kaur | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-24 | nguyen thanh sang | 67 | view |
- The table below presents the food consumption per a person weekly in a European country in 1992 2002 and 2012 67
- With a growing world population one of the pressing issues is that of feeding such a large number of people Some people think that GM foods offer a viable solution to this problem To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 100
- Some people think that the government should provide free education at every level However some says that individuals should pay for their university education Discuss both the views and give your opinion 89
- Tourism has increased so much over the last 50 years that it is having a mainly negative impact on local inhabitants and the environment However others claim that it is good for the economy Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of tourism and give your 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 857.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.12019230769 4.92477711251 84% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40518712597 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.456730769231 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.7392368762 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.833333333 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.6666666667 22.9334400587 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.409798672728 0.215688989381 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.233120210072 0.103423049105 225% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.071727692827 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.287203197602 0.15604864568 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057630451901 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.81 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.21 11.4140731707 63% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.