The chart below gives information about car ownership in the UK from 1975 to 2005.
The line chart provided depicts the proportion of car ownership in the UK over a period of 30 years from 1975 to 2005.
Overall, it is evident that the portion of no car in the UK from 1975 to 2005 witnessed a plummet whereas the opposite was true of the remaining figures, and the percentage of 1 car always ranked in the first in 30 years.
As can be seen from the line chart given, there was a slight decrease of the proportion of 1 car in the UK between 1975 and 1985 to about 38%, while that of no car crashed to almost 25% in 1985. There was a negative correlation between the figure for 1 car and that of no car from 1985 to 2005, in which the former minimally rose to merely 45% and the latter gradually slipped to approximately 23% in 2005.
As far as the line chart is concerned, the portion of 2 cars in the UK always stood at the third position between 1975 and 2005, which was higher compared to that of 3 cars. The figure for 2 cars and 3 cars witnessed a gradual increase in 30 years and reached a peak of about 18% and 10% in 2005, respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-28 | chau hoang | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-23 | Raspreet | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-08 | Wulan | 61 | view |
| 2022-11-03 | Manjinder_kaur | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-24 | nguyen thanh sang | 67 | view |
- The chart shows the employment status of adults in the US in 2003 and 2013 73
- Convenience foods will become increasingly prevalent and eventually replace traditional foods and traditional methods of food preparation To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 89
- Should arts related entertainment venues such as museums and art galleries be free of charge for the general public or should a charge apply for admittance Discuss this issue and give your opinion 78
- The charts show average levels of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore 67
- The charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 857.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.12019230769 4.92477711251 84% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40518712597 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.456730769231 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.7392368762 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.833333333 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.6666666667 22.9334400587 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.409798672728 0.215688989381 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.233120210072 0.103423049105 225% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.071727692827 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.287203197602 0.15604864568 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057630451901 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.81 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.21 11.4140731707 63% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.