some students prefer to take a gap year between high school and university to work or travel. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages ?
There is a topic of interest that whether pupils should have a year-long break for traveling or working. While having a gap year is beneficial to a certain extent, I believe that this phenomenon has an adverse bearing on students.
On the one hand, there are many compelling reasons why some people subscribe to the idea of taking a gap year. Firstly, it helps enrich students’ experiences. They can accumulate knowledge and hone their skills through exploring alien cultures, working or volunteering. For example, by joining in some charities, gap-year takers gain many practical skills like interpersonal or team-working skills, which can be extremely handy later in life. Secondly, delaying tertiary education for one year can afford high school seniors to have time to identify a suitable career path. Due to inadequate career guidance, many college students often drop out of university while studying; therefore, attending vocational training courses beforehand may allow them to find their true passions and cultivate relevant job skills.
On the other hand, despite all the benefits mentioned above, I contend that deferring university enrollment has some glaring disadvantages. Firstly, it is not uncommon that gap-year students suffer from being left behind. As it is hard for older students to be on the same wavelength with younger ones, they may face peer pressure which can drain their confidence. Secondly, students taking a gap year may struggle with resuming their education after distracting from formal schooling. Consequently, they easily lose their momentum and may not be able to keep up pace with their peers’ academic performance.
In conclusion, although taking a gap year has some substantive benefits, I would argue that its merits do not outweigh the drawbacks.
- The digram below shows the plan for rebuilding shopping center in central town The maps below show the layout of a shopping mall before level 1 and after level 2 the construction 56
- The diagram shows the life cycle of a honey bee
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 and 2030 84
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 89
- The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 232, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...non has an adverse bearing on students. On the one hand, there are many compelli...
^^^^
Line 2, column 815, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ions and cultivate relevant job skills. On the other hand, despite all the benef...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1516.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39501779359 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86950162732 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661921708185 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7123898786 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.285714286 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0714285714 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281043572002 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0926931719246 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611167632892 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168739159955 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055020011537 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.02 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.