Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is it the case? What can be done to attract more local people to visit these places?
In recent days, numerous local museums and historical sites attract more visitors who are foreign and nonnative. This problem could be explained by several factors, and different courses of action should be applied to address the situation.
On top of that, there are two primary reasons why local citizens' apathy toward their museums and heritage. The first cause is because the young generation prefers modern entertainment rather than go sightseeing at the museums or historical sites, owing to there are fascinating activities to do at up-to-date entertaining destinations. Furthermore, children have superficial knowledge about local history, thus, they will not interested in those local museums and historical sites. One clear example is in Vietnam the number of young people visits museums or historical sites is significantly small compared to the influx of people who go to malls or theme parks. The other cause is government do not pay much attention to local monument due to they bring back low profit for the country. In other words, repairing old heritages or building new museums cost a huge budget but the revenue cannot cover the payment. For instance, there are a lot of fields such as agriculture or technology that do not have museums since the official state decline to allocate money to build them.
Some measures should be taken to alleviate the problem. One step is that schools should concern more about the local history program that they are teaching. Additionally, they can encourage children and teenagers to frequently go to museums and historical sites. Namely, several school trips to visit local monuments should be held frequently in the interest of helping the young generation learn more about local historical sites. Another step is that government should divert more bucks to building new museums and upgrading old ones. To illustrate, policymakers can pay for applying modern technology to exhibitions at museums, therefore, museums can attract more guests.
In conclusion, indifference to local museums and historical sites is a big problem and solutions should be implemented to tackle this issue.
- In recent years the family structure has changed as well as the family roles What are the changes that have occurred Do you think these changes are positive or negative 82
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why is it the case What can be done to attract more local people to visit these places 77
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 67
- Nowadays more and more people decide to have children later in their life What are the reasons what are the effects on society and family life 71
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 74
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 57, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'citizens'' or 'citizen's'?
Suggestion: citizens'; citizen's
...there are two primary reasons why local citizens apathy toward their museums and heritag...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 427, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'interest'
Suggestion: interest
...bout local history, thus, they will not interested in those local museums and historical s...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 272, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun school seems to be countable; consider using: 'several schools'.
Suggestion: several schools
...o museums and historical sites. Namely, several school trips to visit local monuments should b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in other words, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1810.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3550295858 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80821445317 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550295857988 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6377406172 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.125 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330407923465 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106603904502 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710745232295 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204856416095 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245159024755 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.