Q7 Some people say Hisotry is one of the most important school subjects. Other people think that, in today's world, subjects like Science and Technology are more important than History. Discuss both the views and give your opinion.
Recently, the issue of young people's education has become the subject of heated debate. Some people assert that science and technology education should take precedence over history education, while others argue otherwise. Personally, I wholeheartedly agree with the former stance. In the following essay, both views will be discussed before a conclusion is reached with my opinion.
On the one hand, those who claim that learning history should be a priority as a school subject do so for several reasons. Proponents of this argument insist that receiving history education makes it possible for people not to commit the same mistakes in the past, such as colonisation and imperialism. In addition, to provide a hypothetical example, if it were not for history educations for teenagers, they would be less likely not only to feel a sense of belonging to our society but also to have patriotism. Given these points, some people hold the view that teaching history is more crucial than other subjects.
My opinion, however, is that more emphasis should be placed on science and technology education than history education. Perhaps the most compelling reason is that having a tight grasp of science and technology allows people to land a well-paying job with greater ease given that in this technologically advanced era, there are a multitude of employment opportunities in the field of science and technology. Furthermore, science and technology graduates play a vital role in solving serious contemporary issues of humans, including environmental problems. As an illustration, Tesla which is the most notable firm in the field of the automobile industry could release electric cars because employees who majored in science and technology developed the way up-to-date technology, exerting a positive influence on human beings since electric vehicles do not generate carbon dioxide. In light of the above, I find these more persuasive.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that there are a variety of opinions about this topic. However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that science and technology education should take priority over history education for the reasons discussed above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-06 | thuyan187 | 11 | view |
| 2024-03-16 | MinyiChu | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-17 | sahil nain | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | englishessays | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-21 | shalin63 | 84 | view |
- Q Many parents these days work in other countries taking their families with them Do you think the advantage of the development outweigh its disadvantage 84
- Q17 In some countries the difference in age between parents and children is generally greater than it was in the past Do you think the advantages outweigh the diadvantages 84
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe that the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both 89
- An interesting number of people today change their career and place of residence several times during their life. Is this a positive or negative development? 89
- QQ6 Some people prefer to have temporary jobs which means they only work a few months in a year and use the rest of the time to do what they want What is your opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 127, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a careful manner" with adverb for "careful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that science ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1883.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39541547278 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94551414235 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587392550143 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 610.2 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.4529194269 49.4020404114 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.533333333 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2666666667 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.93333333333 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282187249916 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0925946153584 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615320568728 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167023031224 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0467716947428 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.