The graphs below show the percentage of men and women aged 60-64 who were employed in four countries in 1970 and 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant
The bar charts give information about the proportion of employed workers of both genders aging from 60 to 64 in four different countries between 1970 and 2000.
Overall, there were downward trends in the percentage of employers in four countries. It was also clear that the rates of working men were always higher than those of women.
In 1970, it is evident that USA was leading in positions with the highest rates of both men and women participated in the workforce, at 86% and 78% respectively. USA was closely followed by Indonesia with 84% of men and 65% of women. Belgium was in the third place with 79% of men and 16% lower than that of women. The lowest rank was occupied by Japan with 76% of men and 56% of the opposite gender.
2000 witnessed declines in all four countries mentioned. Belgium saw a steep drop in the rate of employed women while the figure of men fall to 52%. The percentage of working men in USA was still the highest at 78% while women declined to the second lowest rate at 45%. The figures of Indonesia remained unchanged in ranking, with a slight reduction to 74% of men and 50% of women. The trend was the same for Japan with men accounted for 63% of working people and women for 47%.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-12-02 | minhpn | 89 | view |
2021-10-19 | buiminhduc | 84 | view |
2021-09-15 | abread | 56 | view |
2021-08-17 | dinhthu05 | 82 | view |
2021-06-17 | Dave Skylark | 82 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 382, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...duction to 74% of men and 50% of women. The trend was the same for Japan with men a...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, so, still, third, while, in the third place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1001.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48878923767 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40239914405 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511210762332 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.1122519632 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.4166666667 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5833333333 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08333333333 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228003758653 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0961801557557 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058159905669 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165329915021 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0570880089357 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.2329268293 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.76 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.