It is generally acknowledged that Olympic games help to bring various countries together. However, other reckon that holding Olympics waste of money so it can be used for other necessary problems. I will discuss both views along with my opinion in forthcoming fragments .
To commence with, it is considered by individuals that Olympic sports help to strengthen the bond between countries. There are several views behind this notion. First and foremost is that when any nation organize Olympic sports it is best time for that countries to make strengthen their relationship with them. Moreover, players can also understand each together which develops the quality of humanity in them.
However, it is certainly true that some folks argue that holding Olympics is waste of money they have their own opinions behind this . Firstly, organizing Olympics games requires lot of money because the who holding Olympics sports have to give special attention to other countries players. Furthermore, ii is responsibility of that nation to give security to them because if any mishappening occurs with them it will put that nation in big problem. Apart from that, that country can be insulted by all other country dye to this it is very big risk for them.
In nutshell it can be reiterated that although holding Olympics type sports give some benefit to country but it also can create lot of problems in future which cannot be ignore.
- Global warming is one of the biggest threats human face in the 21th century and sea level are rising at an alarming rate What problems are associated with this and what are the possible solutions 33
- Some people think that robots are important for humans future development Others think that robots have negative effects on society Discuss both views and give your opinion 76
- When new towns are planned it is important to build more public parks or sports facilities than shopping centers for people to spend their free time To extent do you agree or disagree 43
- When new towns are planned it is important to build more public parks or sports facilities than shopping centers for people to spend their free time To what extent do you agree or disagree 76
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 20
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 144, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er reckon that holding Olympics waste of money so it can be used for other necess...
^^
Line 1, column 273, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...with my opinion in forthcoming fragments . To commence with, it is considered b...
^^
Line 3, column 232, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the best'.
Suggestion: is the best
...n any nation organize Olympic sports it is best time for that countries to make strengt...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 133, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...they have their own opinions behind this . Firstly, organizing Olympics games requ...
^^
Line 7, column 117, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...give some benefit to country but it also can create lot of problems in future whi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, then, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1197.0 1615.20841683 74% => OK
No of words: 234.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11538461538 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63523554715 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 176.041082164 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559829059829 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 365.4 506.74238477 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4554364842 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.75 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.91666666667 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343365190122 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123667584768 0.084324248473 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076443737658 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217006145516 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0867911704868 0.056905535591 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 78.4519038076 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.