Politicians should pursue common ground and reasonable consensus rather than elusive ideals.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
It is a topic of hot debate -- how politicians should do their jobs. They may have strong ideals to begin
with, but it is important to seek the approval of the majority before taking important decisions. I mostly agree with the prompt because pursuing common ground helps the policy to be implemented much smoother and the mass to receive it positively, which consequently makes the policy stay in place for long periods of time. However, I do concede that leaders require strong ideals and moral codes to be successful, and sometimes they do have to act according to their judgment and not to please others.
First of all, before making crucial decisions, it is important that the politicians take the people's position
into consideration so that the decision is not rejected by the populous. After all, they are the ones who chose the politicians in power. If the politicians pursue common ground, the opposition also has a greater chance of receiving the decision well. This makes the process of implementing a policy easier and smoother. Take, for example, if most of the members of a parliament are in agreement about implementing a new rule, and the mass supports it, there is nothing impeding the rule to be enforced.
Secondly, if the politicians pursue general consensus about a policy before implementing it, the policy will mostly be proper due to the criticism of the opposition, and as a result, it will be long-lasting, effective as well. Take, for example, if a politician is taking in the input from the people and seeking a general consensus, that policy has the potential to be suitable for the citizens, which assures the longevity of the policy. If the policy was not well accepted, however, the people may not follow it or worst of all -- they may reject it altogether. Thus, it is vital for any politician to negotiate with the opposition and common mass to come to a common ground and implement policies from there.
Sometimes, however, the politicians must take strong stands for the greater good of the nation. The masses may not be correct all the time. For instance, if many of the citizens are reluctant to follow the regulations implemented for the covid-19 pandemic, a leader must not give in and withdraw all the regulations for the greater good of the citizens.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-26 | GRACE_047 | 50 | view |
| 2022-08-24 | Sumilak | 66 | view |
| 2022-05-23 | _ashmita.upadhyay_ | 66 | view |
| 2022-03-09 | sunshaowei | 83 | view |
| 2021-09-28 | ksmehrab | 66 | view |
- Politicians should pursue common ground and reasonable consensus rather than elusive ideals Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In dev 54
- Politicians should pursue common ground and reasonable consensus rather than elusive ideals Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In dev 54
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s field of study Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure t 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 37, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'consensus'.
Suggestion: consensus
... Secondly, if the politicians pursue general consensus about a policy before implementing it, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 316, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'consensus'.
Suggestion: consensus
...the input from the people and seeking a general consensus, that policy has the potential to be su...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, well, after all, for example, for instance, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1913.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 391.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8925831202 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77219660872 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.475703324808 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 608.4 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.5944510661 60.3974514979 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.5625 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4375 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.1875 5.21951772744 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166361497967 0.243740707755 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592899452101 0.0831039109588 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469025991424 0.0758088955206 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0904508278568 0.150359130593 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0265565254193 0.0667264976115 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.