Nowadays, it is possible to move ocean creatures from their natural habitats at sea and have them relocated in amusement parks for the purpose of people's recreation. Do you think the advantages of this outweigh disadvantages? Explain your reasons and support them with specific examples.
It is acknowledged that there are a colossal amount of creatures in the ocean. These categories of animals are different from us and they are notably the primary study of scientists. In recent days, it is easy to move ocean animals from their habitat in nature and relocate them in amusement parks in light of people’s preferences. As far as I am concerned, this development is neutral.
On the one hand, there is no denying that there are some benefits of seeing marine beasts at aquariums or parks. First and foremost, we can broaden the horizon about the world. To be more specific, it has been a long year since biologists carried on many experiments and studies about wildlife, let alone the study of animal biology in the ocean has been researched for a long time. Moving ocean creatures to the aquarium is not only a good opportunity for the masses to expand knowledge but also it can help a bunch of people, especially adolescents who are absorbed in science pursuit of their dreams to be a researcher.
Furthermore, humans and marine biology are come into biodiversity and of the great importance to ecological balance. Therefore, moving ocean creatures has a good bearing on the conversation of wild animals against the extinction rate. More than 1400 dolphins killed by people or the catastrophically exacerbate water pollution renders to the rocketing extinction rate of the marine beast, which can be an obvious example.
On the other hand, there is a drawback of this act making me verge on not be in the favor of it. Ocean creatures have an inextricable relationship with their natural habitat. If they are relocated suddenly to a whole new environment, they can have more harm than good. In fact, the standard of humane life can not provide them with enough food, and natural ocean animals have less space to join in their activities.
In a nutshell, there are not only upsides but also downsides of this development. In my school of thought, people should have well-intentioned enterprises to remedy it in the interests of people’s purpose.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-19 | paula_ngy08 | 73 | view |
- Things like puzzles board games and pictures can contribute to a child s development What would you give a child to help him her develop and why Give details and examples in your explanation 89
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment What can government do to address these problems What can individual people do 89
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 46, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'amounts'?
Suggestion: amounts
... acknowledged that there are a colossal amount of creatures in the ocean. These catego...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 82, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...but also downsides of this development. In my school of thought, people should hav...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, well, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1716.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90285714286 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9046563603 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557142857143 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5657265222 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.941176471 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5882352941 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.82352941176 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243948749518 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748512887874 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.080682288738 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131997591238 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0754785117092 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.