Many countries construct modern buildings to give good view of towns and cities. Some people say that countries make new buildings with traditional style to preserve their culture as part of their identity. Agree or disagree.
It is acknowledged that architecture played a vital role in our lives as if it painted colourful in all corners of the world. Along with the rapid development of the world, many modern buildings are gradually appearing and is appealing to their aesthetic. It is paralleled those traditional buildings have conserved the value of history and are respecting the ancient nowadays. Looking from an overall perspective, it is quite difficult of remaining the traditional styles about what are constructing to buildings in this day and age.
In the thriving of society, the need all of us are entitled to have own house, however, the surrounding by environmental issues did not permit to us. Standing the worrying about these situations has led to the erection of tall buildings are provisioning more space for where people can live there and work into these buildings. Simultaneously, the high density of population has been put pressure on the area of land, so that couldn’t be followed the traditions technique in past about how are adapting to these conditions.
On the other hand, global warming is continuing in the day to come, it is putting many challenges for architects and government to rectifying the matters. Indeed, that more than ever had proposed a new style to appropriate for the basic of people desires. By a way to building energy-efficient houses are replacing the traditional houses are using stone, wood that harmful for the environment. Thereby, they are giving a hand to saving our environment and are keeping the green environment by using eco-friendly materials. On the other hand, the family-sized are now minimizing that it causes to changing in our behave about their houses.
In conclusion, the value of traditions is worth maintaining in the modern-day to reminding us about the origin of our ancestors. Nevertheless, they need to innovate our styles and mindfulness to fitting in these days.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-22 | TranMinhDuc | 83 | view |
- What are the benefits of requiring young people to serve in the army Does participation in community work qualify as an alternative 67
- The two pie charts show the percentage of pollutants entering a particular part of the ocean in 1997 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The pictures below show the process of making clothes from recycled plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Some people think that it is effective for students to study in a group at school while others think it is better to study alone Discuss both these two views and gives your own opinions 78
- The diagram below shows how orange juice is produced 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 196, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ent of the world, many modern buildings are gradually appearing and is appealing to their aesthetic. It...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 453, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'traditions'' or 'tradition's'?
Suggestion: traditions'; tradition's
... land, so that couldn’t be followed the traditions technique in past about how are adaptin...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, nevertheless, so, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13694267516 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10963085411 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570063694268 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.8516478097 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 115.214285714 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92857142857 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176768652598 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577246278129 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521352954076 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100748017512 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0611817349872 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 196, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ent of the world, many modern buildings are gradually appearing and is appealing to their aesthetic. It...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 453, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'traditions'' or 'tradition's'?
Suggestion: traditions'; tradition's
... land, so that couldn’t be followed the traditions technique in past about how are adaptin...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, nevertheless, so, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13694267516 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10963085411 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570063694268 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.8516478097 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 115.214285714 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92857142857 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176768652598 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577246278129 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521352954076 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100748017512 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0611817349872 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.