The chart below compares the responses of undergraduates and postgraduates to a questionnaire on their opinion about their university library. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.
The pie charts indicate responses to a survey for postgraduates and undergraduates regarding the range of books and non-print material available in the university library. The option for students included “very good”, “satisfactory”, and “not good”.
Majority of the postgraduates were not at all happy with the range of books in the library while most undergraduates felt the range of books were very good. More than half the undergraduates were happy with the non print material available to them at the university library, whereas almost half of the postgraduates were just satisfied with it.
Most undergrads responded that the range of books available were between impressive and satisfactory, 39% and 29% respectively. Only a third of them felt that the range of books were not good. Over half of undergrads opined that the non-printed materials at the university library was fantastic, followed by 33% being satisfied and the remaining 12% of them were unhappy.
The negative response by the postgraduates on the range of books was at a whopping 65%. Only a mere 15% of postgrads felt that the collection was great and remaining 20% were just satisfied. On non-print material, nearly half of them were satisfied and the other half were divided between the collection being satisfactory and very good.
- You work for an international company You want to attend special family celebration during working hours You need to take time off work for this Write a letter to your manager In your letter Give details of family celebration Tell your manager how much ti 73
- Some people think it is more important to spend public money on roads and motorways than on public transport system such as railways and trams To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Many people try to look younger than they really are For what reasons do you think people try to look younger than they are Is it a good thing or a bad thing 73
- The chart below compares the responses of undergraduates and postgraduates to a questionnaire on their opinion about their university library Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 73
- Future generations must prioritize to protect the environment. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1114.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27962085308 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15377828456 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.454976303318 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 337.5 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0366908997 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.4 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0753579247237 0.215688989381 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0382288569088 0.103423049105 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044749297158 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0589850614055 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321453873594 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.