The maps below show the changes in a town after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam.
The maps provided depict the transformation of a town after the mushrooming of a hydroelectric power dam over a period of 20 years from 1990 to 2010.
Overall, it is evident that the layout of the town underwent some renovations and modifications with the addition, substitution and relocation of some facilities from 1990 to 2010.
As can be seen from the maps given, the town was divided by the river in the middle and almost surrounded by mountains in 1990. In the West, there was an ancient structure and a forest where rare plants and animals lived. Regarding the East of the town, the local settled in villages and produced food for daily use in irrigated farmlands nearby.
As far as the maps are concerned, the river was blocked by the appearance of the hydroelectric dam in order to build the artificial lake in the North of the town in 2010, which led to the destruction of the ancient structure, irrigated farmlands and the devastation of the forest. There was a relocation of the villages towards the South of the town which aimed to make way for the construction of the hotel in the right side of the lake. The town witnessed the spring up of the national grid on either sides of the river with the purpose to supply electricity to the whole town.
- The flow chart below shows the procedures to get a driving license in US 72
- The chart shows the percentage of car manufacturer s total sales in North America South America Europe and Asia 67
- The charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014 67
- The table below shows expenditures of four car companies on advertising in the UK in 2002 67
- Some people say it is more important to plant trees in the open spaces in towns and cities than to build more housing To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The maps provided depict the transformat...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... period of 20 years from 1990 to 2010. Overall, it is evident that the layout o...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of some facilities from 1990 to 2010. As can be seen from the maps given, the ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 30, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'maps'' or 'map's'?
Suggestion: maps'; map's
... to 2010. As can be seen from the maps given, the town was divided by the rive...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ily use in irrigated farmlands nearby. As far as the maps are concerned, the ri...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1039.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61777777778 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77479306313 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.5493815377 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.875 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.125 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.125 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243210307582 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0999098354846 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.088072518659 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150267622531 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10327181619 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.