The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car, bus or
train between 1970 and 2030.
The provided chart makes a comparison of daily commute using three different modes of transport (namely car, bus, and train) over a 60-year period.
Overall, it is evident that car is the most preferred means of transportation throughout the period given. Also, whereas the numbers of workers using car and bus experience an upward trend, the opposite is true for the figures of people using train.
Looking at the information in more detail, in 1970, nearly 5 million UK commuters traveled by car, while the bus and train were used by around 4 and 2 million individuals respectively. In the year 2000, the number of those who used car to commute rose to approximately 7 million, and the figure for train commuters reached 3 million. However, there was a marginal decline of 0,5 million in the number of bus users.
By 2030, almost 9 million UK workers are expected to commute by car, whilst the number of train passengers is also predicted to reach well under 5 million. By contrast, buses are expected to become a less popular choice, with just under 3 million daily commuters.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-10 | chipchip99 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-27 | chau hoang | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-27 | chau hoang | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | xuongrongnho | view | |
| 2023-07-26 | xuongrongnho | 10 | view |
- The diagrams below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for changes to the school site in 2024 56
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 78
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego California and the rest of the world 89
- WRITING TASK 1 You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The figures below compare the number of internet users in several European nations as well as the prevalence of online shopping in these countries Summarise the information by selecting and rep 84
- The maps below depict two different subterranean tunnel systems in two Australian cities 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, well, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 897.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82258064516 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68003607502 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612903225806 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.1204815997 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.125 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269769370532 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123785505154 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0716658020063 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16030778097 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0503333764618 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.