The world should have only one government rather than a national government for each country.
Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
There have been suggestions that there should only be a general government that takes control of every country. From my perspectives, although there are some merits of this idea, the consequences of it would totally outweigh the benefits.
It is undeniable that under the same government, there are some world issues that can be tackled such as wars or discrimination. Imagine people all over the world living under the same government system, sharing the same territory, no one would ever thought about invading another region as they are free to travel everywhere. For example, in the past, the desire of large territory of Germany led to the World War I and II. However, if people lived in same territory, there would be no more wars over lands. Moreover, when there was a single government, people would have the same nationality; therefore, racism and stereotypes would disappear for the time being.
On the other hand, although a single government can address a number of problems relating to races, there are some drawbacks that should be consider thoroughly. The government may find it hard to organize the world with an abundant amount of citizens and countries. The country with the largest population in the world, China, has only 1 billion people, at one-seventh of the world population. The world has over 200 nations with different sizes and government system. Therefore, taking control over the world sounds extremely challenging yet appealing for those people who are ambitious about empowerment. The idea of single government may reduce wars over land but it leads to wars over empowerment, which raise a new problem to the world. Furthermore, if one nation became the owner of the earth, the world would lose its diversity in government systems, which is a crucial factor to development and evolution. Different countries have different ways of lives, for example, it is hard for people who live under the socialism to adopt the way that capitalism runs the world.
In conclusion, although there are some problems that can be tackled by adopting a general government, I believe that this innovative suggestion would bring about more problems. As the disadvantages of it outweigh the advantages, we should stick to the original one.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-30 | dinhphuonglinh | 89 | view |
| 2021-11-13 | eyraen | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-03 | tahmeed1993 | 89 | view |
| 2021-09-28 | eyraen | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-28 | minhpn | 87 | view |
- The line charts illustrate population trends globally by percentage from 1950 to 2040 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people think employers should not care about the way their employees dress but the quality at work To what extent you agree or disagree 73
- The diagram below shows how solar panels can be used to provide electricity for domestic use 61
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipments used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes 84
- The maps below show Pancha Village in 2005 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 141, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'considered'?
Suggestion: considered
...there are some drawbacks that should be consider thoroughly. The government may find it ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 395, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...at one-seventh of the world population. The world has over 200 nations with differe...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1890.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12195121951 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8101870341 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517615176152 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 588.6 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4199588032 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.176470588 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7058823529 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76470588235 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296876283636 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100362289991 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589563343156 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174081945816 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0733667779862 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.