The line graph shows the average prices of tickets sold at a theatre and the bar chart shows the average percentage of tickets sold in 2010 and 2011. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates that the quarterly figures of the average price ticket that is sold in the theatre, in which, the bar graph depicts that the proportion of tickets sold from 2010 to 2011.
Overall, it can be seen that in 2010, tickets price witnessed a considerable upwards, however, falling in the percentage of ticket sold for 1 year.
As can be clearly noticed that in quarter 1 and 2, the average tickets sold were remained steady at nearly 9.5 pounds. Strikingly, it is reached the highest peak at 10.5 pounds in quarter 3 in 2010. After that, there were stably remaining in quarter 4 and it is continuing the figures till the second quarter in 2011 at 10.5 pounds. Otherwise, there was a slight dip to 10.3 pounds in the price tickets of quarter 3 but picked up again at 10.5 in 2011 in the fourth quarter.
It is shown on the column graphs that the quarter 1 and 2 were similar to the proportion of ticket sold at 60% in 2010. After which, declined in the quarter 4 at 67 per cent, it then saw a significant rise to 80 per cent at the end quarter in 2010. As opposed to the quarter 1 and 2 in 2011, there was a sharp plummet to 20%. Interestingly, the proportion of quarters 3 and 4 was turned again at 50% and 70%, respectively, in 2011.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-16 | Zahid6400 | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-04 | TranMinhDuc | 71 | view |
- The maps below show changes in a local theatre in England in 2010 and 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The graphs below show the total percentage of films released and the total percentage of ticket sales in 1996 and 2006 in a country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 77
- The diagram below illustrates how a simple water filter is constructed and how it functions to produce clean drinking water Write a report for a university lecturer describing the diagram below 76
- Nowadays older people who need employment have to compete with younger people What problem does this cause and what are the solutions 78
- Schools should stop using books for teaching children as they find them boring and use film TV and computer instead To what extent do agree with this 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 78, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'upward'?
Suggestion: upward
... tickets price witnessed a considerable upwards, however, falling in the percentage of ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1023.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.33474576271 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55317971538 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470338983051 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1573521259 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.3 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275198829647 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135161233289 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110919196928 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223504036542 0.15604864568 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105838333278 0.0819641961636 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.97 61.2550243902 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.5 10.3012195122 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.13 11.4140731707 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 78, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'upward'?
Suggestion: upward
... tickets price witnessed a considerable upwards, however, falling in the percentage of ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1023.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.33474576271 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55317971538 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470338983051 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1573521259 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.3 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275198829647 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135161233289 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110919196928 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223504036542 0.15604864568 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105838333278 0.0819641961636 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.97 61.2550243902 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.5 10.3012195122 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.13 11.4140731707 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.