Some people think that developing countries need financial help from international organizations. Others think that it is practical aid and advice that is needed. Discuss these views and give your own opinion.
There is a controversial idea heating a debate over the fact that developing regions need the support of financial from international businesses or practical help and advice are more suitable for them. From my perspective, the latter seems to be more realistic as well as feasible than the former for the following reasons.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that financial issues are really vital for developing countries. Doubtlessly, nations that rare improving had to suffer from a lot of wars in the past and they had to endure feudalism. Due to this, they are disadvantaged towards other regions in many aspects including finance. Thus, it is really helpful for developing countries to have financial backup from overseas organizations that have a massive amount of money to aid. To illustrate, Singapore has received a lot of financial aids from the US so that their economy has a considerable growth in recent years. Hence, financial support is essential for developing countries.
On the other hand, practical aid and advice are still more crucial for improving regions from my observation. It is irrefutable to note that the realistic supports such as providing foods or creating amenities, and the advice are more meaningful for the citizens as well as the whole developing nations. The cause is that developing countries lack many facilities that can enhance the living standard for the residents, so practical help is more necessary. Furthermore, due to a lack of knowledge concerning the economy in many individuals, they might utilize financial support in inappropriate cases. Therefore, supplying practical aid like foods or facilities as well as advice is more effective than just giving an amount of money.
To summarize, realistic support and advice are more important than giving financial help to developing countries. Nevertheless, it is possible to aid money, foods, and amenities as well as advise to nations that are ameliorating and balance all together to make them become innovative and renovate worldwide to grow into a better one.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-19 | Yamin_j | 61 | view |
| 2022-03-25 | vidung | 67 | view |
| 2021-11-19 | daoduong3204 | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-09 | Pham Phuong Trinh | 56 | view |
| 2021-11-07 | minhminhvu7 | 67 | view |
- the plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today 73
- In many countries children are becoming overweight and unhealthy Some people think that the government should have the responsibility to solve this problem To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 89
- Many countries are spending a huge amount of money on supporting their competitors to take part in some worldwide sports competition Others argue that it would be better if these countries can spend the money on children to take part in sports To what ext 89
- The bar charts below show the percentages of men and women in employment in three countries in 2005 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The pictures below show the process of making clothes from recycled plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 282, Rule ID: AS_ADJ_AS[1]
Message: Comparison is written "as feasible 'as'".
Suggestion: as
...o be more realistic as well as feasible than the former for the following reasons. ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, nevertheless, really, so, still, therefore, thus, well, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1741.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25981873112 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01172851804 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495468277946 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 561.6 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2265286759 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.066666667 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0666666667 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241923017837 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0883598636313 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638707095307 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152722017211 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0268788356207 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.