Some people think that developing countries need financial help from international organizations. Others think that it is practical aid and advice that is needed. Discuss these views and give your own opinion.
Whether global financial or practical support should be given to developing nations is a matter of debate. While some people believe that it plays an important role in the development of these countries, some think practical help and advice are more significant. My essay is going to analyze both views of this and state my opinion.
On the one hand, practical aid and advice is pivotal for developing nations. First, developed countries may take advantage of their experience in economic and social growth to orientate developing ones. Second, latest device and technology of these countries is also of benefits to their evolution. Therefore, they may replace methods that are out of date by more convenient and faster ones, which will helps them accelerate their speed of revolution. Last but not least, especial aid may prevent them from being confused about which areas to invest in and when to invest in, so they will not waste of money.
On the other hand, the support of the international community is of paramount importance to the development of less-developed parts of the world. People who advocate of monetary support for developing countries may claim that this form of support is indispensable in building infrastructure, which their life becomes more comfortable and get nearer access to industrialization. For example, via loaning a large amount of money from the US, Japan rapidly regenerated their economy after World War II and became one of Four Asian Tigers. In return, they have to sacrifice many of their national interests to be eligible for international funding. Moreover, sustainable development necessitates the building of a strong workforce and the acquisition of technology. As a result, not only can they put modern invention into manufacturing but also have a number of high-educated laborers.
In summary, practical support for developing countries is beneficial in some ways. Notwithstanding, there is stronger evidence that financial help plays a more indispensable role in their growth to developed ones. It is recommended that funded support should be put into practice.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-19 | Yamin_j | 61 | view |
| 2022-03-25 | vidung | 67 | view |
| 2021-11-19 | daoduong3204 | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-09 | Pham Phuong Trinh | 56 | view |
| 2021-11-07 | minhminhvu7 | 67 | view |
- In this technological era personal information is held on computers by many companies and organizations Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- With many problems of transport and accommodation in cities some governments are encouraging businesses to move to rural areas Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later Some people think that having these people to give a talk to school students is the best way to tell them about the dangers of committing a crime Do you agree or disagree 73
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment such as the South Pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Some people think that developing countries need financial help from international organizations Others think that it is practical aid and advice that is needed Discuss these views and give your own opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 352, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to develop' or 'develop'.
Suggestion: to develop; develop
...rguably a more effective way of helping developing countries. Advocates of granting de...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2214.0 1615.20841683 137% => OK
No of words: 385.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75064935065 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.52346637767 2.80592935109 126% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532467532468 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 705.6 506.74238477 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.180569816 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.375 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0625 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 7.06120827912 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169181367792 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0659191895012 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0384127019355 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118913654574 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0241768431761 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.37 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.