Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is this the case, and what can be done to attract more local people to these places?
historical attractions
Nowadays historical locations attract more tourists than local inhabitants. This problem happens due to some reasons, and several measures could be proposed to enhance the number of indigenous people visiting these places.
To begin with, there are some reasons why the main visitors of museums and historical sites are tourists from other areas instead of the regional ones. The first reason is that local communities often lack interest in these historical locations due to the familiarity with their traditional costumes and history. As a result, these individuals will spend time visiting places that they have ever been to so that they can have a better understanding of these destinations. Additionally, another possible cause could be the shortage of activities organized to attract residents such as competition about local history or field trips to museums.
However, the local people’s low attendance at these destinations can be handled by some remedies. One of the feasible solutions would be for the government to stimulate appealing recreational events in these places. This can be done by showing documentaries about ancient events or holding quiz shows about history on a regular basis. Moreover, schools should make students’ field trips to historical sites compulsory as a part of extra curriculum activities. Consequently, students can have more time exploring their historical values and then share these with families members.
In conclusion, the lack of entertainment events held and local people’s interest in historical destinations lead to the lower rate of residents visiting such places. In order to solve the problem, the government need organize more activities there, and students’ visit to museums should be mandatory.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-02 | thaotanya | 67 | view |
| 2024-07-28 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-27 | Chau Anaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaâ | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-25 | Nguyen Ho Khanh Duy | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-20 | mbn250 | 73 | view |
- Countries should try to produce all the food for the population and import as little food as possible To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some say that news has no connection with most people s life and it is a waste of time for most of us to read newspapers and watch television news programs To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some say that news has no connection with most people s life and it is a waste of time for most of us to read newspapers and watch television news programs To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think that news has no connection with people s lives so it is a waste of time to read newspapers and watch television news programmes To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, moreover, so, then, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1501.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60074626866 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97274271757 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582089552239 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.1944564487 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 115.461538462 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6153846154 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69230769231 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.439254268609 0.244688304435 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139652877847 0.084324248473 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0669689167804 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265186884349 0.151304729494 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429693851365 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.