The graph below shows the changes in the maximum number of Asian elephants between 1994 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the changes in the maximum number of Asian
elephants between 1994 and 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make
comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

The bar chart illustrates the comparison between two years 1997 and 2004, in nine countries: Vietnam, India, Malaysia, Sri Lanka, Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, Thailand, and China in terms of the maximum number of Asian elephants. Overall, it can be noticed that the elephant population in 2004 was fewer than in 1997. Also, India remained as the country with the highest number of mammals, whereas China contained the least number of elephants in all two years that were mentioned before. 

To begin with, the number of elephants in India was still far higher than in any other country, although there was a dramatic decline from just below 10,000 in 1997 to 7,500 in 2004. Malaysia and Thailand are the two countries where elephant numbers have decreased by half the figure in 1997 and dropped as low as 1,000. China followed the same trend and in 2004, it had the lowest number at nearly 500.

On the contrary, although the trend was downward in numerous nations, elephant populations in Vietnam and Laos remained stable, at approximately 1,200. Similarly, Sri Lanka and Myanmar also shared a common pattern of quite small fluctuations, from 2,500 in 1997 to 2,000 in 2004 in Sri Lanka, and from 5,000 in 1997 to 4,500 in 2004 in Myanmar, respectively. Myanmar was in the second-highest position regarding the number was almost half of the number of India's elephant population. It can easily be seen that the only country where elephants showed signs of recovering was Cambodia, where numbers may have risen by up to 200.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-03-22 eyraen view
2021-10-07 adamneyul 78 view
2021-06-26 itcwriter 78 view
2021-06-13 Trangdodo 10 view
2021-06-13 Trangdodo view
Essays by user adamneyul :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 485, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll two years that were mentioned before.  To begin with, the number of elephants i...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, may, regarding, second, similarly, so, still, whereas, on the contrary, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1270.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 257.0 196.424390244 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94163424125 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5937230683 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 106.607317073 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556420233463 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 360.9 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.6645239997 43.030603864 187% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.111111111 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5555555556 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1111111111 5.23603664747 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146857435273 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706413846126 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0362821548874 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111662860974 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0127992789023 0.0819641961636 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 40.7170731707 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.