The effect of work on study which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of work on study has sparked the controversy over the potential impact on how schools should prepare students in recent future. In my opinion, schools should teach students in such a way, so that the students are prepared for both university and work. This essay will elaborate this opinion of mine in greater and thus lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why schools should prepare students for both university and work, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that schools are places where students are groomed to make their own decisions. As a result, if we make the decision for students beforehand, this will ruin the main purpose of school. Furthermore, after graduating from school, some may choose to continue their study, while others may opt to work. Thus, preparing students for both work and university will be beneficial, no matter whatever options they choose.
Another key justification to uphold this notion is that, different students have different sets of strengths and weaknesses. Treating them all in the same way will greatly impact their development. For instance, some prefers to learn by studying, while others prefer by gaining experience. Hence, having both the options open will be much more effective.
From what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that schools should direct their teachings in such a way that, students are prepared for both university and work.
- International organizations are trying to solve lots of problems these days. Which problem do you think needs more attention and what are the ways to combat that problem? 77
- The importance of travel seems to be over rated. Brilliant scholars locked themselves at home. Travel is important for education. To what extent to you agree or disagree. 87
- You have just moved into a new home and are planning to hold a party. You are worried that noise may disturb your neighbor.Write a letter to your neighbor. In your letter:•introduce yourself•describe your plans for the party•invite your neighbor to 73
- One way to solve the problem of congestion in cities is to build sky trains which run overhead rather than on or under the ground.What are the advantages and disadvantages of using this solution to solve congestion? 80
- Cultural Shock is a new worrying concern for few immigrants. What are the few possible options to eradicate this? 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, if, may, so, thus, while, for instance, as a result, in my opinion, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1319.0 1207.87684729 109% => OK
No of words: 255.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17254901961 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66125748968 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592156862745 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 388.8 379.143842365 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.71428571429 350% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0032274233 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.461538462 104.977214359 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6153846154 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.30769230769 7.25397266985 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35879873357 0.242375264174 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132363066561 0.0925447433944 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106628859386 0.071462118173 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234329068611 0.151781067708 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100117410808 0.0609392437508 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 12.6369458128 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.1260098522 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.5310837438 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.32886699507 100% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 55.0591133005 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.