Because many children are not able to learn foreign languages, schools should not force them to learn foreign languages. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, it is commonsensical knowledge that foreign language is a compulsory subject in academic curriculum. Nonetheless, that an increasing portion of students show below average linguistic command poses nerve-wrecking questions about the efficacy of this obligation. From my own perspectives, acknowledged privileges undoubtfully outweigh the drawbacks and therefore, we should perpetuate this educational syllabus.
To start with, incompetent language capacity is sufficiently apparent to be pertinent to colossal number of assignments from a wide spectrum of subjects, which consequently follows shortened time allocated to polishing essential skill. However, ironically, the aged notion related to acquisition of language emphasizes largely on exposure and practice. Moreover, the robust barrier of conspicuously different vowel formation has considerately hindered mastering a particular dialect. The apotheosis is inhabitants in Asian, where there is little shared linguistic history. The end result is frequently that students waste time and may feel discouraged and lack self-esteem.
However, advocates of retention of mandatory system reinforce their point of view with eloquently irrefutable pronunciation-relevant advantage. Decades of researches have vindicated children under 7, who possess the most beneficial asset that is unfixed vocal formation, stand significantly higher chances of delivering speech with fluency and coherency. To illustrate, drawing a parallel between adults and junior taking on English from scratch, it is unsurprisingly effortless to speculate the superior performance is executed by the younger rival. Furthermore, being coerced to study, students can presumably devise novel learning methodology that suits their ability. These self-gained skills will enrich their repertoire that can later be efficaciously utilized to help them attain higher position in the ladder of success.
In conclusion, despite the low rates of success in a number of cases, the impact of attempting to learn a language is itself tremendously advantageous. Schools should therefore continue funding this part of the curriculum.
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying What extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- Many companies sponser sports as a way to advertise themselves Some people think this is a good for the world of spory while others think it is negative Discuss both view and give your own opinion 89
- Some believe that people should make efforts to fight climate change while others think it is better to learn to live with it Discuss both views and give your own opinion 65
- Some people think that quality art can be made by anyone while others think that it requires talent and ability Discuss both view and give your own opinion 84
- The diagram describes the structure of a home smokery and how it works To summarize information by selecting key characteristics and compiling a report and if necessary make a comparison 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, nonetheless, so, therefore, in conclusion, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1859.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.21739130435 5.12529762239 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41920865063 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.709030100334 0.561755894193 126% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8762907376 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.933333333 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9333333333 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134353198251 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.038619081147 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458585284805 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0803953762891 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419059979889 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 50.2224549098 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.8 12.4159519038 151% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.87 8.58950901804 138% => OK
difficult_words: 138.0 78.4519038076 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.