The maps below shows university sports courts in 1990 and now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The maps below shows university sports courts in 1990 and now.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The map manifests the outlay of university sports court in 1990 and now. From an overall perspective, there is no change in the right Conner of the plan, while the rest have undergone massive-scaled transformation, which encompasses increased number of tennis courts and a wide array of facilities completely constructed.

Stating with the left Conner, in 1990, the land was utilized as a park, after a few decades, it is substituted by a newly built basketball court. Going south from that ground, if in 1990 we would encounter a car park, in the time being, we will see four tennis courts.

The final modification was executed on the south-east of the sport courts of the university. The changing room, notwithstanding being located in the same venue, it is moved to the east and expanded with current area is nearly doubled the initially plan in 1990. As aforementioned the tennis court was positioned in different land, the fitness center has replaced its original venue.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-12-21 nobitaa 73 view
2024-12-20 khanhkhanhlhp 78 view
2024-12-18 paula_ngy08 61 view
2024-12-17 nguyendangquang.aspect 73 view
2024-12-11 nguyendangquang.aspect 11 view
Essays by user leanguyen :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 819.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0245398773 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00092198561 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.687116564417 0.547539520022 125% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5868549218 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2857142857 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.85714285714 5.23603664747 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147135695193 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0872981743513 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108918845787 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0979065371555 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0444393300913 0.0819641961636 54% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.