Recent generation kids tend to involve in fighting a lot. That is the reason why violence is rising day by day, some elders may think that we should teach our children how to fight against opponents. This may help them to overcome bullies but there are many negative impacts due to getting involved in fighting, reasons are explained in the essay.
Firstly, if we teach the kids how to win against the teasing people it will help children for the current situation. But in the long term there are many disadvantages, like in the beginning it all starts with the confidence of winning on the opponent. Sooner or later they feel that we posses the power to fight and can win easily, so they start picking fight with siblings, friends and other kids. For instance we taught a kid how to clash with others, children can only have skills but they do not know what is morale and ethics. Finally the skills which we supplied to them will be often misused and ultimately making them bad person.
Instead of making them to fight with the bullies we can teach children how to obtain help from others. Like if they are being attacked by some one make run from people and try to find some help, consequently can win the fight. This method is far more useful than teaching how to brawl with others. Along with this we should make them learn about values of life subsequently kids can lend a hand to others who are in need.
To conclude, teaching children how to brawl is not at all a good thing to do in my opinion. Rather than doing that we can make kids to escape from bullies and make them understand the importance having values in life in order to lead a good life without any problems.
- Violent TV shows and aggressive video games should be banned on governmental level do you agree or disagree 73
- The pie charts below show information on the highest level of education of women in Someland in 1945 and 1995 67
- Some people think that teaching methodology in the modern classroom should be based on experiential learning While others believe that traditional approach is still the best To what extent do you agree or disagree with the opinion 73
- The flowchart below shows the process involved in completing the work experience requirement for university students Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 69
- The pie charts below illustrate the number of journal articles read per week by all students PhD students and junior lecturers at an Australian university 42
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 533, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
... do not know what is morale and ethics. Finally the skills which we supplied to them wi...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 578, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[8]
Message: The adverb 'often' is usually put between 'will' and 'be'.
Suggestion: will often be
...ly the skills which we supplied to them will be often misused and ultimately making them bad ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 139, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'someone'?
Suggestion: someone
...ers. Like if they are being attacked by some one make run from people and try to find so...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, if, may, so, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1380.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48051948052 5.12529762239 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25050358863 2.80592935109 80% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532467532468 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 412.2 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.60771543086 81% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5670891446 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5714285714 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109208289091 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0456479444512 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0366744260427 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0805038051583 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027610774618 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 50.2224549098 148% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.7 12.4159519038 70% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.