The maps below shows the town of Lynnfield in 1936 and then later in 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The maps below shows the town of Lynnfield in 1936 and then later in 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The maps manifest outlay of the municipality named Lynnfields in 1936 and a few decades later in 2007. From an overall perspective, it is sufficiently apparent that Lynnfields has undergone massive-scaled transformation into more residential, commercial and accessible town since the middle of 1930s.

In the north-west, there is barely any significantly changes other than a marginal decreased in the number of trees. On the opposite land, there used to be a river running across an untouched ground more than 80 years ago. However, in 2007, it was replaced by various buildings to cater to housing demand of inhabitants.

In the middle of the town, the post office along with bank and library experienced no modifications over the period whereas the sweet shop and butchers were substituted by a spacious supermarket. Beneath it, prior to 2007, was bare land with no buildings whatsoever but in 2007, a large shopping center was established. On the south-west corner of this estate, in the initial outlay it was the location of flower shop preceding being supplanted by travel agent.

With the view of facilitating approaching the city, the circuitous cycle path on the south-east of the map was taken place by a curving road. Meanwhile, in 1936, people would go south-east if they were heading for farm land or government offices, in 2007 their destinations had changed into museum and golf course.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-11-14 ghazaleh Basiri 73 view
Essays by user leanguyen :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1182.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1615720524 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04283160928 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 106.607317073 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.663755458515 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 350.1 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 3.36585365854 357% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5962076632 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.2 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113939778344 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0465584818526 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592929417108 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0707794214722 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0563021504659 0.0819641961636 69% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 40.7170731707 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.