Young people these days tend to be less polite and respectful than in the past. What are causes and solutions?
It is no doubt true that individuals who are young, nowadays, have a propensity to be less well-mannered and respectful to other people than in the past. There are various driving forces why this is a trend and some solutions are proposed to tackle this issue.
The main driving engine of this trend is that their parents do not care about their behaviors, which means that young individuals are allowed by their parents to do. In some families, parents have a tendency to consider their offspring as a friend. Simultaneously, unless parents do not enable us to do such behaviors, they will be judged as people who do not get updated with the trend at the present. When it comes to friends’ perspective, young people can learn behaviors from each other who is the same age as them. Moreover, the young can feel older when behaving less politely to any people who are older than them.
On the other hand, there are various solutions to alleviate this issue, which requires a joint attempt between the society and parents. When it comes to the society, the young should be forced to treat the older better instead of ignoring them in social life. For example, in Japan, children are educated about how to treat the older people in small activities such as helping us to cross the road or directing the right route. When it comes to parents, it is necessary to distinguish between parents’ actions and children’s ones. Due to the fact that without it, children can break their limitations to behave badly to their parents.
In conclusion, there are numerous causes of this pitfall, which are formed by parents and friends’ habits. On balance, I suppose that parents should join hands with the society to reduce the risks of the problem as low as possible.
- Should be banned violate video games Give your opinion to support your idea 67
- The bar ch t below shows the percentage of adults using the Internet in different age groups in UK during 2003 to 2006 61
- Some languages are increasingly spoken in different countries while the usage of others is rapidly declining Is this a positive or a negative development 73
- The diagram below describes the structure of a home smokery and how it works Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 66
- The table below gives the information about spending on different advertisement methods of four car companies in UK in 2008 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, well, for example, i suppose, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1461.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79016393443 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55368796551 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514754098361 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.3594566349 49.4020404114 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.357142857 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7857142857 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180343786714 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0613806238326 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.079098449023 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113720846531 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.081602737724 0.056905535591 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 50.2224549098 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.