Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is this case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places?
It is widely credited those museums and places of historical figures are comparatively attended by travellers rather than local dwellers. It might be derived from lacking the prominent in visiting these places. This essay aims to justify the causes of this phenomenon and also propose some suggestions for rectifying these matters.
There is a spectrum of main factors for why foreign people have tended to be paying more attraction within a visit to museums and historical. The first is that those who show a greater sense of curiosity about the continent in another country so that it is motivated inner themselves to accomplish their expedition. In addition, they are expected to be discovering the cultural heritage that obtains a sight into the history of the destination country. What it means that comprehending local inhabitants who have suffered all events that are happened with the past of their cities.
On the other hand, in order to trigger the interest of native people in taking place of visit the museum and historical sites are possible to implement. One method is carrying out-organize varied activities in arising the cognition of local people towards appealing to these places. By incorporating art performances of famous statues and mixed up to the story within its figures as well. Furthermore, it needs to the provision of history lessons that cultivate their patriotism and are prone to the history of their own country that they can express to ancestors.
In conclusion, a tremendous enthusiasm in presenting of foreigners to visit museums and historical sites are being common, whereas proper actions can awaken of people who are in living there that is the purpose to raise awareness of their history.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-21 | TranMinhDuc | 78 | view |
| 2020-09-22 | longpm2k | 78 | view |
| 2020-02-24 | anh thu080903 | 89 | view |
| 2019-04-29 | komal25 | 67 | view |
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people think that the best way to make road transfer is to make vehicles drive take a driving test every year To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The picture below shows Bell Hill farm in 1976 and the changes that took place in 2006 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 89
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football While other people think that taking part in individual sports is better like tennis or swimming Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- The maps give information about a university sports court 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, so, thus, well, whereas, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1454.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1743772242 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84287070691 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580071174377 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1753533345 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.166666667 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4166666667 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.08333333333 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.382355421641 0.244688304435 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115216340746 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0946694117198 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208621527312 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00707229140825 0.056905535591 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.