The graph below shows the number of passenger railway journeys made in Great Britain between 1950 and 2005.
The graph illustrates how many passengers travelled by railway in Great Britain from 1950 to 2005.
In general, the number of passengers who opted to travel by railway, including the National rail network, London Underground, and Light rail & metro systems, experienced upswings. Plus, the lowest figure was found in Light rail & metro systems throughout the period.
In 1950, the number of travellers on the National rail network stayed well beyond the others, at about 1,000 million people. Following that was the figure for London Underground’ passengers, at nearly 750 million people. From 1950 to 1980, the number of passengers on the National Rail network and the London Underground decreased dramatically to around 620 and 500 million people respectively, then rose again by 580 and 500 million people, approximately as the first point’ figures. Meanwhile, travellers opting for Light rail & metro systems appeared in 1960. There was an unchanged, remaining figure between 1960 and 1980, at nearly 1 million people. In the last twenty-five years, its figure increased considerably to about 200 million people.
- The chart shows the percentage of car manufacturer s total car sales in different regions from 2006 to 2010 95
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The graph below shows trends in US meat and poultry consumption 78
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 73
- The graph below gives information about coffee production in 4 different countries from 1990 to 2010 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, then, well, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 949.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48554913295 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86480292797 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583815028902 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 57.7446486217 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.444444444 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158760404072 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770752724034 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117864877063 0.0843802449381 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177509355577 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.151990047647 0.0819641961636 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.