The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.
The line graph illustrates how much water was used for three different sectors in the world, and the table gives information about the water consumption in Brazil and Democratic Republic of Congo during the period of 100 years from 1900 to 2000.
Overall, there was a general upward trend in the use of water for agriculture, industry and households over the given period. It is also clear that agriculture consumed more water than the other two sectors.
To begin with, the consumption of water for agriculture started at around 500 km3 in the first year before increasing dramatically to 3,000 km3 one hundred years later. In comparison, there was merely a relatively small amount of water used for industrial and domestic sector in the beginning. Afterwards, the figures experienced a noticeable rise to roughly 1,300 km3 for the former and 500 km3 for the latter.
The population of Brazil was 176 million in the year 2000, which was by far higher than that of Democratic Republic of Congo, with only 5.2 million people. Brazil covered 26,500 km2 of irrigated land compared to only 100 km2 in Congo. Regarding the water use, each individual in Brazil used 359 m3, whereas the figure for the other country was much lower, at 8 m3 per person.
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 84
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO 2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
- The table below gives information about the values of exports of kiwi fruit from New Zealand to five countries between 2010 and 2012 78
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 78
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in four countries in 1950 and 2002 and projections for 2050 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, regarding, so, whereas, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1043.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89671361502 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60364090772 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596244131455 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4786501727 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.888888889 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267065440165 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108644241409 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110336748149 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182143288811 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116757896742 0.0819641961636 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.