Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Communication is considered to be essential and has several vast impacts on our lives. Though there are some controversial opinions about the different levels of influence between spoken channel and written one, I firmly claim that both of them could bring the same amount of positive effects for us.
On the one hand, speaking is a vital key of conversation in some specific situations of society. When we exchange information by talking, many elements could be included deliberately to make our speech become more sweeping such as gestures, facial expressions and tone of voice. For instance, teachers tend to use body language along with various pitches and show appropriate attitudes in order to deliver their lectures to students effectively. As students would pay more attention to the lecturers’ words and engage in the lessons, their academic performance could be significantly enhanced, simultaneously, they might have a good rapport with the teachers.
On the other hand, we could benefit greatly from written communication on a regular basis. While speaking assists us to convey ideas immediately in person, keeping written texts is a convenient way to reserve our deep insights in long term and read them whenever we want regardless of context. It is hard to negate that a large number of precious and immortal novels, stories, poetries and other literary works have been passed through generations and they are still enjoyed worldwide. Not only are the humans’ sources of knowledge preserved safely, but the reputation of the authors and poets could also be widespread throughout the centuries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-24 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-17 | Kha Linh | 61 | view |
| 2024-12-08 | ankushgurumaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-30 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 84 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 321, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...s of context. It is hard to negate that a large number of precious and immortal novels, stories, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, while, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1360.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3125 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92791613116 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6875 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.485049242 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.0 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0929235294611 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0368724026156 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439502504624 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0650249436135 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302836503531 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.24 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.