challenges and opportunities in the building sector to secure a sustainable future
As humankind, we are in the era that we have great struggles with almost any kind of agenda to optimize. When this comprehensive optimization process includes lifetime, efficiency, and accessibility, leads us to have term of “sustainability”. That last sentence seems to be ideal definition of sustainability. However, while we have discussion on “sustainability in the building sector”, lifetime, efficiency, and accessibility may not seem enough to initiate a strong and sudden argument that leads a consensus to secure a sustainable future of the building sector. This is because, the sector mainly depends on profit and short-term interests since we are living in “the Capitalist Era”, which is the main challenge, in my opinion.
In this essay, complexity and difficulties of sustainability process in the building sector will mainly be discussed and giving the argument of “Digital Cities” for the countless opportunities of the process.
Firstly, starting with the complexity and difficulties, it can be seen that in many developed countries the process has already been started, in the lead of governments, which are mainly based on academic institutions in those countries. Academy is working on the process, producing ways to handle with it, sometimes in corporation with companies, however, those studies are still in the local level and do not attract the majority, except the argument of “Save the Future: Sustainable World”, which is mainly an advertisement of today’s European politics and the sector’s way to affect “the customers” for their public relationship. But how we turn this into a real and “Capitalist Process” so that we may gain more improvements in short term, and also profitable scenario? The answer is “Digitalization in the Building Industry”. Fortunately, we have already started with digitalize the construction environment, which is main reason of the vast majority of private sector involve in: “profit”. This is trying to say that we, engineers and academy, can expand the interest in sustainability in building sector to the international level by managing the process with the capitalist, or with another saying, corporational approach so that we could provide more profitable environment for everyone to attract the necessary attention of everyone. The best way to do this is that producing arguments for “profitable opportunities” of the process.
What are the profitable opportunities? For me, the answer of this question is not extremely important since we can produce tons of them. The answer should be how could we combine all profitable opportunities with many sectors by not stacking only in opportunities in “the building sector”: The concept of “Digital Cities”. This is the main opportunity for the many sectors. An example, mobility is one of the most important topics in sustainability in construction industry but “operational logistics”, which is billions of dollars industry, is not our concern. However, it could be a product of our digital city concept. That was a sole example for other sectors. If we discuss on how the digital cities contribute to securing a sustainable future of the building sector, we may have countless opportunities. One could be simultaneous estimation of the traffic in a city with real time data. With this approach, we can optimize the traffic lights with the most efficient way, so that we can reduce our “dirty” footprint and reduce the time consumption on roads. The global outcomes of this “potential module” of our digital city could amaze all of us. Another one, basis of a digital city, we can let the machine estimate the urban planning of a city, while it is growing, so that the best solution for waste logistics, water infrastructure can be estimated, or even the best and most efficient location of wind turbines can be determined after giving the mass input of weather data to our digital cities.
To conclude, as discussed, opportunities are countless. Whereas, the point is integration of the data: “the big data of cities: Digital Cities”, and this concept is the best way to unitize all the sectors to gain more benefits for our agenda: “Sustainable Future of the Building (and all) sectors”.
- In most countries multinational companies and their products are becoming more and more important.This trend is seriously damaging our quality of life.Do you agree or disagree? 73
- New technologies provided machines which replaced workers to do certain physical jobs and tasks. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 11
- Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation’s history. Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by news ones.How important is it to maintain old buildings?Should history stand in the way of progress? 56
- In most countries multinational companies and their products are becoming more and more important.This trend is seriously damaging our quality of life.Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Levels of youth crime are increasing rapidly in most cities around the world.What are the reasons for this, and suggest some solutions. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 218, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'termed'.
Suggestion: termed
...cy, and accessibility, leads us to have term of “sustainability”. That last sentence...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, so, still, whereas, while, in short, kind of, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 13.1623246493 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 56.0 24.0651302605 233% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 93.0 41.998997996 221% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3603.0 1615.20841683 223% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 672.0 315.596192385 213% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36160714286 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.09145979004 4.20363070211 121% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33577152272 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 314.0 176.041082164 178% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467261904762 0.561755894193 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1126.8 506.74238477 222% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 8.0 2.10420841683 380% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 7.0 0.809619238477 865% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 16.0721442886 168% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 98.9969447091 49.4020404114 200% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 133.444444444 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8888888889 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85185185185 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 8.67935871743 219% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240181599183 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.080743205557 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101656101432 0.0667982634062 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186700772742 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508181728343 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 191.0 78.4519038076 243% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.