Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, the fact that climate change has been tremendously plaguing the entire world is apparently discernible. A number of people believe that human should devise a way to live with it rather than preventing. From my own perspective, I partly disagree with this notion as the outcome of reckless actions will be perilous.
On the one hand, it is sufficiently obvious that humankind need to acclimatize to weather change as a variety of extreme phenomenon is irreversible. Consequently, people are reduced to a predicament of prosper or perish situation. If human being can manage to adapt to alien environment, they will be able to survive and maintain their supreme ascendancy, or else, the result will be exceedingly horrible. For example, theoretically, with current development in technology, people are not capable of reducing the average sea level, therefore, they ought to propose plausible solutions such as the sea dam in Netherland, which serves as a sea barrier to protect the inland from flooding.
On the other hand, if people still procrastinate in taking serious actions to combat climate change, it would likely be much more challenging for human being to adjust to new and hostile environment. These irresponsible activities would follow numerous species pushed to the brink of extinction, colossal loss of life and facilities. For instance, according to recent research, if the earth’s temperature continued to increase due to indiscriminate greenhouse gases emission, such hazardous weather like flood in European or extreme heat will be common scenario. Therefore, it stands to reason that in order to guarantee the future of our offspring generation, we must prevent it from exacerbating.
In conclusion, though humankind will need to get accustomated to climate change to a certain extent, it is crucial for us to immediately take necessary actions to address this problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-02 | Amarul Azmi | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-25 | Nhun Nhun | 84 | view |
| 2023-05-29 | hieu13092006 | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-15 | bnhanh02 | 87 | view |
| 2022-10-29 | Hangphan02 | 73 | view |
- The picture below shows the recycling process of wasted glass bottles Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Do you think business should hire employees who will spend the entire life working for the company Explain why you agree or disagree Use specific reason and details to support your answer 89
- The table below illustrates weekly consumption by age group of dairy products in a European country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying What extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- Students perform better in school when they are rewared rather than punished To what extent do you agree Discuss both view and give your own opinion 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 290, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...agree with this notion as the outcome of reckless actions will be perilous. On ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, consequently, if, so, still, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1607.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3745819398 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14734377946 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628762541806 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.9972097519 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.916666667 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9166666667 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156559291358 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0562662923482 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442867204325 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100783629888 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476053885518 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.32 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.