It is thought that the invention of household appliances for cleaning such as dishwashers washing machines and vacuum cleaners negatively affects people s health To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view

Essay topics:

It is thought that the invention of household appliances for cleaning such as dishwashers, washing machines and vacuum cleaners negatively affects people’s health. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view?

Recently, there has been a tendency in using electronic devices for the housework instead of cleaning physically. Some believe that these techonogical solutions detrimental seriously to people’s wellbeing. From my point of view, I totally agree with this opinion.
On the one hand, storing a variety of housework devices at home can run the risk of electrical problems. These devices replace mostly cleaning activities, which people find very bored on a daily basis, so they allow people to address the tasks easier. Despite their handy, housework devices have to deal with a large amount of dirt, especially wet dirt and water. If once prolonged devices leak electricity, the high volt power may run straight to people, then this can causes damaging effect on their bodies. Moreover, due to electrical issues, if these machines such as vacuum cleaners lose controls, then this can attack members unstopably, and cause injuries. As a result, they are unconscious, and even more dangerous to be disabled some part of their bodies.
On the other hand, cleaning inventions are based on electricity, so their productivities will experience a dip by the time. If a washing machine do not swipe enough oil and waste, reused spoons, bowls, … will directly transfer the mixture to people’ mouths. Consequently, they suffer from stomache, but if this situation keep repeating, they can face with a lot of chronic diseases.
To sum up, machines that helping people in the housework contain perniciously disadvantages. Thus, people should consider before buying.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-11-05 tienduchoang887 56 view
Essays by user tienduchoang887 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 470, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'cause'
Suggestion: cause
...y run straight to people, then this can causes damaging effect on their bodies. Moreov...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, may, moreover, so, then, thus, well, such as, as a result, to sum up, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1315.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 248.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30241935484 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83618553009 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.673387096774 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 401.4 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.0770109928 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.9285714286 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7142857143 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191615853653 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0605828870179 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453073562256 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11444496163 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0280745565171 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.